Healthy China initiative index and its applications: evidence from Shandong Province
-
摘要:
目的 围绕健康中国15项行动，构建健康中国行动评价指标体系，评估山东省16个市健康山东推进效果，识别发展短板，提出干预策略。 方法 以《健康中国行动2021―2022年考核指标体系》为基础，依据指标的重要性、代表性及可获得性，结合专家意见，识别指标体系。其后，利用逼近理想解排序法（technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution，TOPSIS）评估健康山东2020年的推进效果，并用仪表盘分析识别各市发展短板。 结果 健康中国指标体系包括健康危险因素控制、健康服务提供和健康结果三个维度。比较健康中国行动2030年目标值和各项指标在16市的最大值，取相对大的值作为TOPSIS的最优解，2020年山东省健康中国行动指数平均值为0.558，青岛市排名最高（0.696），菏泽市排名最低（0.386）。山东省在健康危险因素控制方面的变异系数最大（0.226），在健康结果方面的变异系数最小（0.144）。 结论 山东省16个城市已基本实现健康中国行动2022年目标值，但距离2030年目标还存在一定差距，且地区间以及不同维度间发展不平衡的问题突出，着重关注健康危险因素控制。 Abstract:Objective This study aims to propose a comprehensive evaluation index system for Healthy China initiative based on 15 special campaigns. Using this index system, the study evaluated the progress of the initiative, and then identified the shortcomings, as well as put forward improvement strategies for 16 cities of Shandong Province. Methods Integrating "the Assessment implementation plan for Healthy China initiative Plan from 2021 to 2022" with multiple experts' views, indicators were identified according to indicators importance, indicators representativeness, and data availability. Technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) method was applied to evaluate the Healthy China initiative, and dashboard analysis was used to identify the shortcomings of each city. Results Three dimensions, including prevention and control of health risk factors, health service provision, and health outcomes, were identified. Comparing the Healthy China initiative 2030 targets and the maximum value of each indicator in 16 cities, Shandong province, when the relatively large value was taken as the ideal solution of TOPSIS, the mean value of the Healthy China initiative index in Shandong province was 0.558 in 2020. Qingdao was ranked the highest (0.696), and Heze the lowest (0.386). The coefficient of variation for dimension of prevention and control of health risk factors was the highest (0.226), the coefficient for dimension of health outcomes was the lowest (0.144). Conclusions Sixteen cities in Shandong province have basically achieved the targets required by the Healthy China initiative 2022, but there were significant gaps from the targets required to achieve by 2030. Unbalanced development across cities and dimensions was prominent, and prevention and control of health risk factors should be emphasized. -
Key words:
- Healthy China initiative /
- Index research /
- TOPSIS /
- Dashboard analysis
-
图 1 山东省16市健康中国行动指数和各维度指数的地理格局
注：基于自然资源部标准地图服务网站下载的审图号为GS(2019)1822号的标准地图制作，底图无修改; a、b、c、d为只考虑2030年目标值时山东省16市健康中国行动指数和各维度指数的地理格局；e、f、g、h为同时考虑2030年目标值和16市各指标的最大值时山东省16市健康中国行动指数和各维度指数的地理格局。
Figure 1. Geographical pattern of Healthy China initiative index and all dimensions index in 16 cities of Shandong Province
-
[1] 中共中央国务院. 《"健康中国2030"规划纲要》[EB/OL]. (2016-10-25)[2022-06-25]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-10/25/content_5124174.htmThe State Council of China. Outline of the Healthy China 2030 Plan[EB/OL]. (2016-10-25)[2022-06-25]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-10/25/content_5124174.htm [2] 中共中央国务院. 《健康中国行动(2019-2030年)》[EB/OL]. (2019-07-15)[2022-06-25]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-07/15/content_5409694.htmThe State Council of China. Healthy China Action Plan (2019-2030)[EB/OL]. (2019-07-15)[2022-06-25]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-07/15/content_5409694.htm [3] 中共中央国务院. 《健康中国行动2021-2022年考核实施方案》[EB/OL]. (2022-02-16)[2022-06-25]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/guihuaxxs/s7824/202202/ca499de912e9400597febf5c24206f23.shtmlThe State Council of China. Assessment implementation plan for Healthy China initiative Plan from 2021 to 2022[EB/OL]. (2022-02-16)[2022-06-25]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/guihuaxxs/s7824/202202/ca499de912e9400597febf5c24206f23.shtml [4] Sachs J, Schmidt-Traub G, Kroll C, et al. SDG index and dashboards report 2018[EB/OL]. (2018-07-09)[2022-06-25]. http://www.sdgindex.org/reports/sdg-index-and-dashboards-20181. [5] Li Z, Luo Z, Wang Y, et al. Suitability evaluation system for the shallow geothermal energy implementation in region by Entropy Weight Method and TOPSIS method[J]. Renew Energ, 2022, 184: 564-576. DOI:10.1016/j.renene. 2021.11.112. [6] Yun Z, Zhang C, Junmin F, et al. Paths and strategies for a resilient megacity based on the water-energy-food nexus[J]. Sustain Cities Soc, 2022, 82: 103892. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103892. [7] 甘肃省人民政府办公厅. 《甘肃省"十四五"全民医疗保障规划》[EB/OL]. (2021-10-30)[2022-06-25]. http://ybj.lanzhou.gov.cn/art/2022/1/7/art_22102_1086498.htmlGeneral Office of Gansu Provincial Government. 14th Five-year Plan for National Medical Security plan of Gansu[EB/OL]. (2021-10-30)[2022-06-25]. http://ybj.lanzhou.gov.cn/art/2022/1/7/art_22102_1086498.html [8] 何蓓蓓, 高晶磊, 刘春平, 等. 医保支付方式改革对县域医共体建设效果的影响分析[J]. 医学与社会, 2021, 34(8): 108-111, 116. DOI: 10.13723/j.yxysh.2021.08.022.He BB, Gao JL, Liu CP, et al. Analysis on the Impact of Reform of Medical Insurance Payment Methods on the Construction Effect of County Medical Consortium[J]. Medicine and Society, 2021, 34(8): 108-111, 116. DOI: 10.13723/j.yxysh.2021.08.022. [9] Li K, Wang X, Li L, et al. Large variability of O3-precursor relationship during severe ozone polluted period in an industry-driven cluster city (Zibo) of North China Plain[J]. J Clean Prod, 2021, 316: 128252. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128252. [10] Xie Y, Wang L, Huang G, et al. A Stochastic Inexact Robust Model for Regional Energy System Management and Emission Reduction Potential Analysis-A Case Study of Zibo City, China[J]. Energies, 2018, 11(8): 2108. DOI: 10.3390/en11082108. [11] Ma F. Spatial equity analysis of urban green space based on spatial design network analysis (sDNA): A case study of central Jinan, China[J]. Sustain Cities Soc, 2020, 60: 102256. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102256. [12] Naghibi M, Faszi M, Ekhlassi A. Pesign possibilitios of leftover spaces as a pocket park in relation to planting enclosure[J]. Urban for Urban Gree, 2021, 64: 127273. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127273. [13] Ding L, Wang Q, Zheng Y, et al. Analysis of Health Assessment of Water Resources of Futuan River in Rizhao City by 5G Wireless Communication[J]. Wirel Commun Mob Com, 2022, 2022. DOI: 10.1155/2022/3175769. [14] Liu J, Feng J, Gao Z, et al. Hydrochemical characteristics and quality assessment of groundwater for drinking and irrigation purposes in the Futuan River Basin, China[J]. Arab J Geosci 12, 2019, 12(18): 1-4. DOI: 10.1007/s12517-019-4732-2. -
下载:
点击查看大图
图(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 311
- HTML全文浏览量: 169
- PDF下载量: 68
- 被引次数: 0