Effectiveness evaluation of comprehensive intervention about injury among the left-behind children in rural area of Enshi
-
摘要: 目的 探讨综合措施对农村留守儿童伤害干预的效果,为减少农村留守儿童伤害提供依据。方法 分层整群抽取恩施某乡镇6所中小学校的3~5年级和7~8年级的留守儿童,以学校为单位随机分为干预组和对照组。对干预组留守儿童开展为期一年的伤害综合干预活动,对照组不进行干预,在干预前后分别进行问卷调查来评价综合干预效果。结果 一年后,干预组留守儿童知识得分为(11.53±1.56)分,高于对照组(11.07±2.30)分,差异有统计学意义(t=3.540,P<0.001);不安全行为得分为(2.64±1.79)分,低于对照组留守儿童(3.48±1.78)分,差异有统计学意义(t=7.070,P<0.001);有11项指标的知晓率提高,有2项不安全行为的发生率降低,差异均有统计学意义(均有P<0.05);伤害发生率由23.53%降低至11.69%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=23.127,P<0.001)。结论 综合干预可以降低农村留守儿童伤害发生率,是预防留守儿童伤害的有效途径。Abstract: Objective To explore the effectiveness of comprehensive intervention about injury and provide evidence for eliminating injury among the left-behind children in rural area. Methods Left-behind children were recruited from grades 3-5 in 3 primary schools and grades 7-8 in 3 secondary schools of rural Enshi by stratified and cluster sampling and randomly divided into an intervention group and a control group by school. The intervention group was given comprehensive intervention for 1 year, while the control group without any interventions. Before and after the intervention, a questionnaire survey was conducted among the two groups. Results After 1 year, the score of injury knowledge in the intervention group (11.53±1.56) were higher than that of the control group (11.07±2.30), respectively(t=3.540,P<0.001). The score of unsafe behavior in the intervention group (2.64±1.79)were lower than that of the control group (3.48± 1.78), respectively(t=7.070,P<0.001). Awareness rates about 11 indicators of the intervention group were higher and incidence rates about 2 unsafe behaviors of the intervention group were lower than before intervention, and all the differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05). The incidence rate of injury in the intervention group decreased from 23.53% to 11.69% and the difference was statistically significant(χ2=23.127,P<0.001). Conclusions Comprehensive intervention can reduce the incidence rate of injury, which is an effective measure for injury control among the left-behind children.
-
Key words:
- Child /
- Intervention studies /
- Questionnaires
-
World report on child injury prevention: summary. The WHO report [R]. Geneva, 2008. 李小攀,杨黎明,孙乔,等. 基于社区卫生服务中心报告的浦东新区0~14岁儿童伤害情况分析 [J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2013,17(10):871-874. 朱丽萍,李艾,陈轶英,等. 农村儿童伤害综合性干预效果评价 [J]. 中国公共卫生, 2012,28(6):754-756. Pressley JC, Barlow B, Durkin M, et al. A national program for injury prevention in children and adolescents: the injury free coalition for kids [J]. J Urban Health, 2005,82(3):389-402. 罗菊,向兵,丁彦培,等. 汉川市农村留守儿童伤害影响因素分析 [J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2014,29(4): 553-555. 贾改珍,宋龙笛,徐天和,等. 菏泽市东明县农村儿童意外伤害特征及其影响因素研究 [J].中国儿童保健杂志, 2014,22(4):423-426. 全国妇联课题组. 全国农村留守儿童城乡流动儿童状况研究报告 [J]. 中国妇运, 2013, (6):30-34 李志义,郭祖鹏,黄红儿,等. 我国伤害预防与控制的现状 [J]. 中国慢性病预防与控制, 2007,15(2):181-183. 周福林,段成荣. 留守儿童研究综述 [J]. 人口学刊, 2006,(3):60-64,封3. 中华预防医学会伤害预防与控制分会. 关于伤害界定标准的决定 [J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2011,15(1):9-10. 王声湧. 伤害研究应着眼于伤害的预防与控制 [J]. 疾病控制杂志, 2001,5(3):193-194. Bruce B, McGrath P. Group interventions for the prevention of injuries in young children: a systematic review [J]. Inj Prev, 2005,11(3):143-147. Boufous S, Ali M, Nguyen HT, et al. Child injury prevention in Vietnam: achievements and challenges [J]. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot, 2012,19(2):123-129. 蓝剑,王萍,韦琳,等. 乡村中小学生伤害综合干预模式效果研究 [J]. 国外医学·医学地理分册, 2011,32(2):106-108,111. 王虹,林艳,刘一心,等. 深圳市社区儿童伤害监测干预模式的研究 [J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2010,14(10):962-964.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 202
- HTML全文浏览量: 40
- PDF下载量: 34
- 被引次数: 0