广州市男性工人包皮环切术接受意愿及影响因素分析

陆少艳; 李茳; 张志忠; 林爱华

doi:10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2016.03.017

广州市男性工人包皮环切术接受意愿及影响因素分析

doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2016.03.017

1. 中山大学公共卫生学院医学统计与流行病学系, 广东广州 510080;
2. 广州市南沙区疾病预防控制中心疾控科, 广东广州 511458

基金项目:

广州市科技计划（2012J4300087）

详细信息

作者简介:
陆少艳(1989-),女,安徽蚌埠人,在读硕士研究生。主要研究方向:健康行为与干预研究。

中图分类号: R181
计量
- 文章访问数: 236
- HTML全文浏览量: 44
- PDF下载量: 39
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-10-05
- 修回日期: 2015-12-27

The prevalence and influential factors for the willingness to accept circumcision among male workers in Guangzhou City, China

1. Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China;
2. Department of Disease Control, Guangzhou Nansha Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 511458, China

摘要

摘要: 目的调查男性工人包皮环切手术接受意愿现状，分析手术接受意愿的影响因素。方法以广州市南沙区建筑工地和工厂为基地采用方便整群抽样方法选取4家建筑工地和2家制造业工厂，对男性工人进行现场问卷调查；应用Logistic回归模型分析数据。结果实际有效调查836名男性工人，其中建筑工地工人391人（46.8%），制造业工人445人（53.2%），手术接受意愿率为85.4%。不同文化程度间的接受意愿差异有统计学意义（χ²=12.67，P=0.002），且手术接受意愿具有随着文化程度的提高而升高的趋势；艾滋病知识高分组的手术接受意愿比低分组高，差异有统计学意义（χ²=16.19，P<0.001）；手术知识高分组与低分组比较差异有统计学意义（χ²=19.90，P<0.001）；调整相关混杂因素后，对手术医学益处认知得分越高（OR=1.84，95% CI：1.44～2.34，P<0.001），身边有人做过包皮环切术（OR=1.83，95% CI：1.06～3.15，P=0.029）是愿意接受手术的促进因素。结论男性工人的手术接受意愿较高，提示该人群适合手术的推广和普及。
- 包皮环切术,男性 /
- 获得性免疫缺陷综合征 /
- 流行病学
Abstract: Objective To investigate the male workers' willingness to accept circumcision and analyze its influential factors. Methods A construction sites, industries-based cross-sectional survey, convenient cluster sampling study was conducted in Nansha District, Guangzhou City. Male workers from four construction sites and two factories were selected to attend the survey. Logistic models were conducted to analyze data. Results Of 836 eligible participants, 391(46.8%) were construction workers and 445(53.2%) were manufacturing industry workers. The proportion willingness to accept circumcision was 85.4%. The willingness to accept circumcision between different educational level had a statistical significance (χ²=12.67,P=0.002). The higher their educational level was the higher their acceptance of circumcision was; Compared to the low score group of AIDS knowledge, the high score group had higher willingness to circumcision, the difference between the two groups had a statistical significance(χ²=16,19,P<0.001). And the difference between the two groups of male circumcision knowledge had the similar result(χ²=19.90,P<0.001). After adjustment, “the more knowledge about medical benefits of male circumcision” (OR=1.84,95% CI:1.44-2.34,P<0.001) and “being affected by surroundings who had circumcision before” (OR=1.83,95% CI:1.06-3.15,P=0.029) were the positive factors for affecting acceptance rate. Conclusions The proportion willingness to accept circumcision among male workers is high, it suggests that the popularization and promotion of male circumcision in this population has an advantage.
- Circumcision, male /
- Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome /
- Epidemiology

HTML全文

参考文献(14)

Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, et al. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 Trial [J]. PLoS Med, 2005,2(11):e298.

Bailey RC, Moses S, Parker CB, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial [J]. Lancet, 2007,369(9562):643-656.

Gray RH, Kigozi G, Serwadda D, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: arandomised trial [J]. Lancet, 2007,369(9562):657-666.

Halperin DT, Bailey RC. Male circumcision and HIV infection: 10 years and counting [J]. Lancet, 1999,354(9192):1813-1815.

Weiss HA, Halperin D, Bailey RC, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention: from evidence to action? [J]. AIDS, 2008,22(5):567-574.

肖水源. 《社会支持评定量表》的理论基础与研究应用 [J]. 临床精神医学杂志, 1994,4(2):98-100.

Njeuhmeli E, Forsythe S, Reed J, et al. Voluntary medical male circumcision: modeling the impact and cost of expanding male circumcision for HIV prevention in eastern and southern Africa [J]. PLoS Med, 2011,8(11):e1001132.

李君. 重庆市流动人口包皮环切手术推广模式的研究[D]. 重庆:重庆医科大学, 2012.

黄永迪,杨蕾,王倩,等. 非穆斯林男性吸毒者包皮环切术接受意愿调查 [J]. 中国公共卫生, 2013,29(2):248-250.

邓伟,杨晓波,蒋俊俊,等. 广西男性医学大学生包皮环切接受意愿影响因素研究[J]. 现代预防医学, 2010,37(21):4087-4089

,4093.

Walcott MM, Jolly PE, Ehiri JE, et al. Factors associated with the acceptability of male circumcision among men in Jamaica [J]. PLoS One, 2013,8(9):e75074.

Jones D, Cook R, Arheart K, et al. Acceptability, knowledge, beliefs, and partners as determinants of Zambian men's readiness to undergo medical male circumcision [J]. AIDS Behav, 2014,18(2):278-284.

Macintyre K, Andrinopoulos K, Moses N, et al. Attitudes, perceptions and potential uptake of male circumcision among older men in Turkana County, Kenya using qualitative methods [J]. PLoS One, 2014,9(5):e83998.

文静,唐晓君,钟朝晖,等. 重庆市男性包皮环切术接受意愿及影响因素分析 [J]. 中国全科医学, 2011,4(15):1690-1692.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计