三种白纹伊蚊监测方法在登革热风险指示中的适用性探讨

陈燕霞; 张希如; 叶双岚; 彭铭记; 曾燕清; 陈晓婷; 李泳枝; 陈清; 俞守义

doi:10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2019.06.020

三种白纹伊蚊监测方法在登革热风险指示中的适用性探讨

doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2019.06.020

1.
510515 广州, 南方医科大学公共卫生学院流行病学系
2.
510405 广州, 广州市白云区疾病预防控制中心
3.
510515 广州, 南方医科大学公共卫生学院

基金项目:

广州市医药卫生重大科技项目 2006-Zda-001

详细信息

通讯作者:
俞守义, E-mail: qingchen@fimmu.com

中图分类号: R181.22
计量
- 文章访问数: 360
- HTML全文浏览量: 116
- PDF下载量: 30
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-11-09
- 修回日期: 2019-03-03
- 刊出日期: 2019-06-10

Applicability of three surveillance methods for Aedes albopictus in dengue risk indication

1.
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
2.
Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Baiyun District, Guangzhou 510405, China
3.
School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China

Funds:

Major Medical and Health Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou 2006-Zda-001

More Information

Corresponding author: YU Shou-yi, E-mail: qingchen@fimmu.com

摘要

摘要: 目的了解三种常用白纹伊蚊监测方法在登革热风险指示中的适用性。方法 2017年12月~2018年7月，在广州市白云区两农村同时用三种监测方法进行白纹伊蚊幼虫和成蚊密度监测，并收集同期气象数据和登革热病例情况。结果幼虫和成蚊密度消长均受气温影响，各监测指标反映的白纹伊蚊密度消长趋势一致，但幼虫与成蚊密度存在差异。2017年12月-2018年2月，两监测点布雷图指数为5.66~24.53，指示风险为1~3级，诱蚊诱卵指数和成蚊密度指数分别为0~4.00和0~1只/人·h，指示风险均为0级；3月份，布雷图指数反映风险等级为3级，而诱蚊诱卵指数分别为2.13和3.77，风险为0级，成蚊密度指数分别为4只/人·h和6只/人·h，指示风险为1级和2级；4月份之后，各监测指标反映的登革热风险等级趋于一致。结论布雷图指数指示的登革热风险总是高于或等于诱蚊诱卵指数和成蚊密度指数指示的风险。诱蚊诱卵指数和成蚊密度指数能较敏感地反映白纹伊蚊的活动情况，指示登革热风险的准确性高。
- 白纹伊蚊 /
- 蚊子监测 /
- 指标 /
- 登革热风险
Abstract: Objective To disscus the applicability of three surveillance methods for Aedes albopictus in dengue risk indication. Methods Larval and adult mosquito surveillance were conducted in two villages of Guangzhou by using three vector monitoring methods. Meteorological data and dengue cases were obtained in the same period. Results The population dynamics of larvae and adult mosquitoes were affected by temperature and their overall trend was consistent, but there were differences between the abundance of larvae and adult mosquitoes. From December to February the next year, Breteau index(BI) ranged from 5.66 to 24.53 with a risk of level 1 to 3 for dengue fever, while the mosquito and oviposition positive index(MOI) and adult-mosquito density index(ADI) were 0 to 4.00 and 0 to 1 per man-hour, respectively, indicating no risk for dengue fever. In March, compared with BI which indicated a risk of level 3, MOI were 2.13 and 3.77, respectively, representing for no risk. ADI were 4 to 6 per man-hour, indicating a risk of level 1 and level 2, respectively. After April, the dengue risk level reflected by each indicator became to be consistent. Conclusions The risk of dengue fever indicated by BI is always higher than or equal to the risk indicated by the other two. Compared with BI, MOI and ADI are more sensitively in reflecting the activity of Ae. albopictus.
- Aedes albopictus /
- mosquito surveillance /
- index /
- dengue risk

HTML全文

图 1 标化后A村白纹伊蚊密度消长曲线

Figure 1. Normalized population dynamic of Aedes albopictus for A village

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 标化后B村白纹伊蚊密度消长曲线

Figure 2. Normalized population dynamic of Aedes albopictus for B village

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 登革热风险等级划分标准^[7]

Table 1. Risk classification criterion for dengue fever

风险(等级)	BI	MOI	ADI (只/人·小时)
无风险(0级)	BI≤5	MOI≤5	ADI≤2
低度风险(1级)	5 < BI≤10	5 < MOI≤10	2 < ADI≤5
中度风险(2级)	10 < BI≤20	10 < MOI≤20	5 < ADI≤10
高度风险(3级)	BI > 20	MOI > 20	ADI > 10

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 登革热病例、气温和白纹伊蚊媒介监测情况

Table 2. Dengue cases, average temperature and vector surveillance of Aedes albopictus

月份/监测点	BI (风险等级)	MOI (风险等级)	ADI (只/人·小时) (风险等级)	月平均气温(℃)	白云区登革热病例(例)
A村
17年12月	13.46 (2级)	1.92 (0级)	0 (0级)	14.90	0
18年1月	9.80 (1级)	1.92 (0级)	0 (0级)	13.47	0
18年2月	15.68 (2级)	0.00 (0级)	0 (0级)	14.32	0
18年3月	26.42 (3级)	2.13 (0级)	4 (1级)	19.80	1^b
18年4月	71.15 (3级)	15.09 (2级)	12 (3级)	22.03	0
18年5月	137.25 (3级)	26.00 (3级)	19 (3级)	27.83	1
18年6月	70.59 (3级)	18.52 (2级)^a	13 (3级)	27.52	3
18年7月	135.85 (3级)	63.46 (3级)	28 (3级)	29.22	3
B村
17年12月	5.66 (1级)	1.79 (0级)	1 (0级)	15.77	0
18年1月	21.15 (3级)	4.00 (0级)	0 (0级)	14.47	0
18年2月	24.53 (3级)	0.00 (0级)	0 (0级)	15.40	0
18年3月	30.19 (3级)	3.77 (0级)	6 (2级)	20.80	1^b
18年4月	48.08 (3级)	5.77 (1级)	12 (3级)	22.86	0
18年5月	128.30 (3级)	45.28 (3级)	16 (3级)	28.65	1
18年6月	103.70 (3级)	30.20 (3级)^a	14 (3级)	28.14	3
18年7月	147.17 (3级)	73.21 (3级)	46 (3级)	29.70	3
注：^a表示受18年6月台风影响缺失该月诱蚊诱卵指数，采用SPSS缺失值分析中的EM算法进行填补；^b表示输入性病例。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(19)

[1]	刘复生, 周昌清, 林佩卿. 白纹伊蚊种群生态学研究——Ⅴ. 广州地区白纹伊蚊自然种群数量季节消长研究[J]. 中山大学学报(自然科学版), 1990, 29(2): 118-122. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSDZ199002019.htm Liu FS, Zhou CQ, Lin PQ. Studies on the population ecology of Aedes albopictus——5. The seasonal abundance of natural population of Aedes albopictus in Guangzhou[J]. Acta Sci. Natur. Univ. Sunyatseni, 1990, 29(2): 118-122. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSDZ199002019.htm
[2]	Bonizzoni M, Gasperi G, Chen X, et al. The invasive mosquito species Aedes albopictus: current knowledge and future perspectives[J]. Trends Parasitol, 2013, 29(9): 460-468. DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2013.07.003.
[3]	广东省卫生和计划生育委员会. 广东省登革热防控专业技术指南(2015年版)[Z]. 2015. Guangdong Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission. Technical Guide for Dengue Prevention and Control in Guangdong Province (2015 edition)[Z]. 2015.
[4]	严子锵, 胡志刚, 江毅民, 等. 标准间指数在白纹伊蚊自然种群动态监测中的应用研究[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械, 2006(5): 352-354. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2781.2006.05.007. Yan ZQ, Hu ZG, Jiang YM, et al. Study on the application of standard space index in the population dynamic surveillance of Aedes albopictus[J]. Chin J Hyg Insect & Equip, 2006(5): 352-354. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2781.2006.05.007.
[5]	任旭琦. 伊蚊诱捕器的设计及应用研究[D]. 广州: 南方医科大学, 2009. Ren X. Studies on development and application of an Aedes-trap[D]. Guangzhou: Southern Medical University, 2009.
[6]	李美娟, 陈国宏, 陈衍泰. 综合评价中指标标准化方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2004, 12(z1): 45-48. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1003-207X.2004.z1.012. Li MJ, Chen GH, Chen YT. Study on target standardization method of comprehensive evaluation[J]. Chin J Manage Sci, 2004, 12(z1): 45-48. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1003-207X.2004.z1.012.
[7]	广州市疾病预防控制中心. 广州市登革热媒介白纹伊蚊监测第15期周报(2018-9-4)[EB/OL]. (2018-10-10)[2018-11-1]. http://www.gzcdc.org.cn/News/View.aspx?id=3473. Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The 15th weekly surveillance report of Aedes albopictus vector for Dengue fever (week 4, September 2018)[EB/OL]. (2018-10-10)[2018-11-1]. http://www.gzcdc.org.cn/News/View.aspx?id=3473.
[8]	黄建华, 石挺丽, 陈远源, 等. 多变量灰色模型MGM(1, n)在白纹伊蚊密度预测中的应用[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2016, 20(1): 87-90. DOI: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2016.01.022. Huang JH, Shi TL, Chen YY, et al. Application of multivariable grey model (1, n) in prediction of Aedes albopictus density[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2016, 20(1): 87-90. DOI: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2016.01.022.
[9]	林立丰, 段金花, 李荣彪, 等. 现场比较诱蚊诱卵器与传统幼虫监测效果的研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2006(6): 454-457. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4692.2006.06.007. Lin LF, Duan JH, Li RB, et al. Comparative study of the monitoring results of the mosq-ovitrap method and the traditional larval index surveys in the field[J]. Chin J Vector Biol & Control, 2006(6): 454-457. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4692.2006.06.007.
[10]	李伟强, 关炽雄, 李功理. 诱蚊诱卵器监测法在广州大学城蚊媒监测中的应用[J]. 医学动物防制, 2014, 30(8): 860-862. DOI: 10.7629/yxdwfz201408011. Li WQ, Guan ZX, Li GL. The application of Mosq-ovitrap monitoring methods of college town in Guangzhou[J]. J Med Pest Control, 2014, 30(8): 860-862. DOI: 10.7629/yxdwfz201408011.
[11]	Xia D, Guo X, Hu T, et al. Photoperiodic diapause in a subtropical population of Aedes albopictus in Guangzhou, China: optimized field-laboratory-based study and statistical models for comprehensive characterization[J]. Infect Dis Poverty, 2018, 7(1): 89. DOI: 10.1186/s40249-018-0466-8.
[12]	Delatte H, Gimonneau G, Triboire A, et al. Influence of temperature on immature development, survival, longevity, fecundity, and gonotrophic cycles of Aedes albopictus, vector of chikungunya and dengue in the Indian Ocean[J]. J Med Entomol, 2009, 46(1): 33-41. DOI: 10.1603/033.046.0105.
[13]	夏丹, 滕萍英, 陈晓光, 等. 白纹伊蚊滞育及其分子机制[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2016, 34(3): 282-289. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJSB201603020.htm Xia D, Teng PY, Chen XG, et al. Diapause of Aedes albopictus and the related molecular mechanisms[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2016, 34(3): 282-289. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJSB201603020.htm
[14]	喻潇. 白纹伊蚊和埃及伊蚊对温度、光周期耐受范围的比较研究[D]. 北京: 中国疾病预防控制中心, 2013. Yu X. Comparison studies on the tolerance range of Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti to temperature and photoperiod[D]. Beijing: Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 2013.
[15]	段恒璐. 白纹伊蚊成蚊在不同温度条件下生存繁殖能力变化研究[D]. 北京: 中国疾病预防控制中心, 2017. Duan HL. Study on the changes of survival and reproduction ability of adult Aedes albopictus under different temperature conditions[D]. Beijing: Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 2017.
[16]	黄建华, 石挺丽, 周景忠, 等. 基层公共卫生医生对幼虫监测法与诱蚊诱卵器法评价的定性研究[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2016, 20(11): 1120-1123. DOI: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2016.11.011. Huang JH, Shi TL, Zhou JZ, et al. A qualitative study on evaluation of field public health physician related to two dengue vector surveillance method: larval survey and mosq-ovitrap[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2016, 20(11): 1120-1123. DOI: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2016.11.011.
[17]	Bonizzoni M, Gasperi G, Chen X, et al. The invasive mosquito species Aedes albopictus: current knowledge and future perspectives[J]. Trends Parasitol, 2013, 29(9): 460-468. DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2013.07.003.
[18]	于德宪. 登革热监测方法的系列研究[D]. 广州: 南方医科大学, 2008. Yu DX. Studies of Dengue Fever surveillance method[D]. Guangzhou: Southern Medical University, 2008.
[19]	Focks DA. A review of entomological sampling methods and indicators for dengue vectors[R]. World Health Organization on behalf of the Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, 2003.