• 中国精品科技期刊
  • 《中文核心期刊要目总览》收录期刊
  • RCCSE 中国核心期刊(5/114,A+)
  • Scopus收录期刊
  • 美国《化学文摘》(CA)收录期刊
  • WHO 西太平洋地区医学索引(WPRIM)收录期刊
  • 《中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)》核心库期刊 (C)
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 《日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(中国)》(JSTChina)收录期刊
  • 美国《乌利希期刊指南》(UIrichsweb)收录期刊
  • 中华预防医学会系列杂志优秀期刊(2019年)

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

冠心病合并慢性心力衰竭患者不同结局的零膨胀联合脆弱模型

李靓 田晶 闫晶晶 任嘉 韩清华 张岩波

李靓, 田晶, 闫晶晶, 任嘉, 韩清华, 张岩波. 冠心病合并慢性心力衰竭患者不同结局的零膨胀联合脆弱模型[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2021, 25(8): 962-967. doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2021.08.016
引用本文: 李靓, 田晶, 闫晶晶, 任嘉, 韩清华, 张岩波. 冠心病合并慢性心力衰竭患者不同结局的零膨胀联合脆弱模型[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2021, 25(8): 962-967. doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2021.08.016
LI Jing, TIAN Jing, YAN Jing-jing, REN Jia, HAN Qing-hua, ZHANG Yan-bo. Joint frailty models for zero-inflated analysis of different outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease complicated with chronic heart failure[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION, 2021, 25(8): 962-967. doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2021.08.016
Citation: LI Jing, TIAN Jing, YAN Jing-jing, REN Jia, HAN Qing-hua, ZHANG Yan-bo. Joint frailty models for zero-inflated analysis of different outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease complicated with chronic heart failure[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION, 2021, 25(8): 962-967. doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2021.08.016

冠心病合并慢性心力衰竭患者不同结局的零膨胀联合脆弱模型

doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2021.08.016
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金 81872714

山西省重点实验室 201805D111006

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    韩清华,E-mail: syhqh@sohu.com

    张岩波,E-mail: sxmuzyb@126.com

  • 中图分类号: R181.2;R541

Joint frailty models for zero-inflated analysis of different outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease complicated with chronic heart failure

Funds: 

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81872714

Shanxi Provincial Key Laboratory 201805D111006

More Information
  • 摘要:   目的  建立零膨胀联合脆弱模型探讨冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病(简称冠心病)合并慢性心力衰竭患者不同结局的影响因素,降低患者不良结局的发生。  方法  选取2014-2015年两所三级甲等医院冠心病合并慢性心力衰竭患者,收集患者住院期间的电子病历信息以及随访信息,建立零膨胀联合脆弱模型进行影响因素分析。  结果  本研究共纳入患者2 221例,1 312例患者未发生任何事件(59.07%),699例患者再住院(31.47%),307例患者死亡(13.82%)。性别、职业、BMI是冠心病合并慢性心力衰竭患者不同结局的共同影响因素,陈旧性心肌梗死、QRS间期延长是减少患者未再住院的可能性的影响因素;高龄、美国纽约心脏病协会(New York heart association, NYHA)心功能分级≥Ⅲ级、心脏瓣膜病是患者再住院与死亡的危险因素,增加再住院与死亡风险;QRS间期延长和心房颤动是患者死亡的危险因素,冠脉搭桥为保护性因素,降低患者死亡风险。  结论  零膨胀联合脆弱模型可同时分析冠心病合并慢性心力衰竭患者未再住院、再住院及死亡的影响因素,为高危患者识别、干预和治疗提供理论依据。
  • 表  1  CHD合并CHF患者再住院情况

    Table  1.   The situation of re-hospitalization of patients with coronary heart disease complicated with chronic heart failure

    住院次数 频数
    1 418
    2 140
    3 79
    4 24
    5 13
    6 25
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  CHD合并CHF患者再住院和死亡的基本资料比较[n (%)]

    Table  2.   Comparison of basic data of rehospitalization and death in patients with coronary heart disease complicated with chronic heart failure [n (%)]

    基本情况 住院(n=2 221) 再住院(n=699) P 死亡(n=307) P 基本情况 住院(n=2 221) 再住院(n=699) P 死亡(n=307) P
    年龄(岁) < 0.001 < 0.001 陈旧性心肌梗死 < 0.001 0.005
       < 45 12(0.54) 2(16.67) 1(8.33)   无 1 206(54.30) 299(24.79) 144(11.94)
      45~ < 60 235(10.58) 56(23.83) 5(2.13)   有 1 015(45.70) 400(39.41) 163(16.06)
      60~ < 75 904(40.70) 228(25.22) 75(8.30) 心房颤动 < 0.001 < 0.001
      75~ < 90 959(43.18) 370(38.58) 180(18.77)   无 1 776(79.96) 491(27.65) 214(12.05)
    ≥90 111(5.00) 43(38.74) 46(41.44)   有 445(20.04) 208(46.74) 93(20.90)
    职业 < 0.001 < 0.001 高血压 0.087 0.284
      体力 1 514(68.17) 538(35.54) 241(15.92)   无 791(35.61) 231(29.20) 101(12.77)
      非体力 707(31.83) 161(22.77) 66(9.34)   有 1 430(64.39) 468(32.73) 206(14.41)
    医保类型 < 0.001 < 0.001 心脏瓣膜病 0.030 0.002
      市医保 1 610(72.49) 578(35.90) 257(15.96)   无 2 083(93.79) 667(32.02) 276(13.25)
      新农合 611(27.51) 121(19.80) 50(8.18)   有 138(6.21) 32(23.19) 31(22.46)
    NYHA心功能分级 < 0.001 < 0.001 恶性肿瘤 0.650 0.105
      Ⅱ 927(41.74) 205(22.11) 58(6.26)   无 2 192(98.69) 691(31.52) 300(13.69)
      Ⅲ 971(43.72) 380(39.13) 142(14.62)   有 29(1.31) 8(27.59) 7(24.14)
      Ⅳ 323(14.54) 114(35.29) 107(33.13) QRS间期延长 0.014 < 0.001
    BMI(kg/m2) 0.966 < 0.001   无(≤120 s) 1 894(85.28) 577(82.55) 229(74.60)
       < 18.5 87(3.92) 29(4.15) 27(8.79)   有(>120 s) 327(14.72) 122(17.45) 78(25.40)
      18.5~ < 24.0 821(36.97) 260(31.67) 133(43.32) 冠脉搭桥 0.614 0.004
      24.0~ < 28.0 910(40.97) 282(37.20) 106(34.53)   无 1 936(87.17) 613(97.70) 284(92.51)
      ≥28.0 403(18.14) 128(18.31) 41(13.36)   有 285(12.83) 86(2.30) 23(7.49)
    家族史 0.725 0.063
      无 1 874(84.38) 587(31.32) 270(14.41)
      有 347(15.62) 112(32.28) 37(10.66)
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  CHD合并CHF患者未再住院、再住院、死亡影响因素的零膨胀联合脆弱模型

    Table  3.   Joint frailty models for zero-inflated of influencing factors of non-rehospitalization, rehospitalization and death in patients with coronary heart disease complicated with chronic heart failure

    参数 Est sx P OR/HR Est的95% CI
    上限值 下限值
    Logistic回归分析模型
    截距 0.136 0.794 0.864 -1.422 1.694
      性别 -0.745 0.134 < 0.001 0.475 -1.008 -0.482
      年龄 0.034 0.117 0.769 1.035 -0.195 0.264
      职业 2.500 0.154 < 0.001 12.181 2.197 2.803
      NYHA心功能分级 -0.001 0.086 0.991 0.999 -0.171 0.169
      BMI 0.772 0.090 < 0.001 2.163 0.595 0.949
      陈旧性心肌梗死 -0.250 0.124 0.044 0.779 -0.493 -0.007
      心房颤动 -0.058 0.145 0.686 0.943 -0.342 0.225
      心脏瓣膜病 0.030 0.223 0.894 1.030 -0.407 0.466
      QRS间期延长 -0.693 0.161 < 0.001 0.500 -1.008 -0.378
      冠脉搭桥 -0.090 0.175 0.609 0.914 -0.433 0.254
    再住院
      性别 0.532 0.131 < 0.001 1.703 0.276 0.789
      年龄 0.214 0.069 0.002 1.239 0.079 0.349
      职业 -0.599 0.122 < 0.001 0.550 -0.838 -0.359
      NYHA心功能分级 0.352 0.079 < 0.001 1.422 0.197 0.508
      BMI -2.227 0.061 < 0.001 0.108 -2.348 -2.107
      陈旧性心肌梗死 0.023 0.111 0.833 1.024 -0.195 0.242
      心房颤动 0.033 0.105 0.752 1.034 -0.173 0.240
      心脏瓣膜病 0.844 0.213 < 0.001 2.326 0.427 1.261
      QRS间期延长 0.082 0.152 0.588 1.086 -0.216 0.380
      冠脉搭桥 -0.157 0.145 0.277 0.855 -0.440 0.126
      θ 0.979 0.002 < 0.001 0.975 0.983
    死亡
      性别 0.815 0.128 < 0.001 2.259 0.564 1.066
      年龄 0.305 0.088 0.001 1.357 0.132 0.478
      职业 -1.307 0.168 < 0.001 0.271 -1.637 -0.978
      NYHA心功能分级 0.356 0.081 < 0.001 1.428 0.197 0.515
      BMI -0.251 0.073 0.001 0.778 -0.393 -0.108
      陈旧性心肌梗死 0.028 0.122 0.818 1.029 -0.212 0.268
      心房颤动 0.333 0.134 0.013 1.396 0.071 0.596
      心脏瓣膜病 0.640 0.193 0.001 1.897 0.262 1.019
      QRS间期延长 1.384 0.139 < 0.001 3.992 1.112 1.657
      冠脉搭桥 -4.351 0.474 < 0.001 0.013 -5.281 -3.421
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Savarese G, Lund LH. Global public health burden of heart failure[J]. Card Fail Rev, 2017, 3(1): 7-11. DOI: 10.15420/cfr.2016:25:2.
    [2] 中国心血管健康与疾病报告编写组. 中国心血管健康与疾病报告2019概要. 中国循环杂志[J], 2020, 35(9): 833-854. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2020.09.001.

    China Cardiovascular Health and disease Report Compilation Group. Report on cardiovascular health and diseases in China 2019: an updated summary[J]. Chin Circul J, 2020, 35(9): 833-854. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2020.09.001.
    [3] Aizpuru F, Eduardo M, Inés G, et al. Hospitalizations for heart failure: epidemiology and health system burden based on data gathered in routine practice[J]. Medicina Clínica Práctica, 2020, 3(4-5): 100140. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcpsp.2020.100140.
    [4] Zhang Y, Zhang J, Butler J, et al. Contemporary epidemiology, management, and outcomes of patients hospitalized for heart failure in China: results from the China heart failure (China-HF) registry[J]. J Card Fail, 2017, 23(12): 868-875. DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.09.014.
    [5] Liu L, Huang X, Yaroshinsky A, et al. Joint frailty models for zero-inflated recurrent events in the presence of a terminal event[J]. Biometrics, 2016, 72(1): 204-214. DOI: 10.1111/biom.12376.
    [6] Nozaki A, Shirakabe A, Hata N, et al. The prognostic impact of gender in patients with acute heart failure - an evaluation of the age of female patients with severely decompensated acute heart failure[J]. J Cardiol, 2017, 70(3): 255-262. DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2016.11.015.
    [7] Deswal A, Bozkurt B. Comparison of morbidity in women versus men with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2006, 97(8): 1228-1231. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.11.042.
    [8] 闫晶晶, 田晶, 王可, 等. 冠心病合并慢性心力衰竭患者再住院条件脆弱模型分析[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2020, 37(01): 66-69. DOI: CNKI:SUN:ZGWT.0.2020-01-019.

    Yan JJ, Tian J, Wang K, et al. Analysis of fragile model of rehospitalization conditions in patients with coronary heart disease complicated with chronic heart failure[J]. Chin J Health Statistics, 2020, 37(01): 66-69. DOI: CNKI:SUN:ZGWT.0.2020-01-019.
    [9] Pacho C, Domingo M, Núñez, R, et al. Predictive biomarkers for death and rehospitalization in comorbid frail elderly heart failure patients[J]. BMC Geriatr, 2018, 18(1): 109. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-018-0807-2.
    [10] 张航向, 宁晓暄, 王晓明. 女性心血管疾病的研究进展[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志, 2015, 17(1): 95-97. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0126.2015.01.026.

    Zhang HX, Ning XH J, Wang XM, et al. Research progress of cardiovascular diseases in women[J]. Chin J Geriatr Heart Brain Vessel Dis, 2015, 17(1): 95-97. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0126.2015.01.026.
    [11] Lainščak M, Milinkovicć I, Polovina M, et al. Sex-and age-related differences in the management and outcomes of chronic heart failure: an analysis of patients from the ESC HFA EORP Heart Failure Long-Term Registry[J]. Eur J Heart Fail, 2020, 22(1): 92-102. DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.1645.
    [12] Voors AA, Ouwerkerk W, Zannad F, et al. Development and validation of multivariable models to predict mortality and hospitalization in patients with heart failure[J]. Eur J Heart Fail, 2017, 19(5): 627-634. DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.785.
    [13] Noori A, Shokoohi M, Baneshi MR, et al. Impact of socio-economic status on the hospital readmission of Congestive Heart Failure patients: a prospective cohort study[J]. Int J Health Policy Manag, 2014, 3(5): 251-257. DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.94.
    [14] Allesøe K, Søgaard K, Aadahl M, et al. Are hypertensive women at additional risk of ischaemic heart disease from physically demanding work?[J]. Eur J Prev Cardiol, 2016, 23(10): 1054-1061. DOI: 10.1177/2047487316631681.
    [15] Wallenborn J, Marx A, Störk S, et al. Prognostic significance of serial high-sensitivity troponin I measurements following acute cardiac decompensation-correlation with longer-term clinical outcomes and reverse remodelling[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2017, 232: 199-207. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.01.021.
    [16] 管慧, 戴国华, 高武霖. 慢性心力衰竭1578例患者心源性死亡发生情况的巢式病例对照研究[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2020, 35(05): 2598-2603. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BXYY202005085.htm

    Guan H, Dai GH, Gao WL. Nested case-control study on the occurrence of cardiogenic death for 1578 patients with chronic heart failure[J]. Chin J Tradit Chin Med Pharm, 2020, 35(05): 2598-2603. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BXYY202005085.htm
    [17] Mecklai A, Subačius H, Konstam MA, et al. In-hospital diuretic agent use and post-discharge clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for worsening heart failure: insights from the EVEREST trial[J]. JACC Heart Fail, 2016, 4(7): 580-588. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.02.008.
    [18] Sharma A, Lavie CJ, Borer JS, et al. Meta-analysis of the relation of body mass index to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization in patients with chronic heart failure[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2015, 115(10): 1428-1434. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.02.024.
    [19] Yoshihisa A, Sato T, Kajimoto K, et al. Heterogeneous impact of body mass index on in-hospital mortality in acute heart failure syndromes: an analysis from the ATTEND registry[J]. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care, 2019, 8(7): 589-598. DOI: 10.1177/2048872617703061.
    [20] Horwich TB, Fonarow GC, Clark AL. Obesity and the obesity paradox in heart failure[J]. Prog Cardiovasc Dis, 2018, 61(2): 151-156. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2018.05.005.
    [21] Gavaldà-Manso M, Jimenez-Marrero S, Cainzos-Achirica M, et al. Reduced levels of vasopressin, an independent mechanism in the obesity paradox in patients with chronic heart failure: Insights from the DAMOCLES study[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2019, 276: 171-176. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.10.094.
    [22] Carbone S, Canada JM, Billingsley HE, et al. Obesity paradox in cardiovascular disease: where do we stand?[J]. Vasc Health Risk Manag, 2019, 15: 89-100. DOI: 10.2147/vhrm.s168946.
    [23] 田晶, 杨弘, 陈鑫龙, 等. 冠心病合并心力衰竭患者死亡风险Cox回归模型分析[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2020, 12(6): 683-686. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4055.2020.06.10.

    Tian J, Yang H, Chen XL, et al. Analysis of Cox regression model of death risk in patients with coronary heart disease and heart failure[J]. Chin J Evid Based Cardiovasc Med, 2020, 12(6): 683-686. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4055.2020.06.10.
    [24] Allen LA, Smoyer Tomic KE, Smith DM, et al. Rates and predictors of 30-day readmission among commercially insured and Medicaid-enrolled patients hospitalized with systolic heart failure[J]. Circ Heart Fail, 2012, 5(6): 672-679. DOI: 10.1161/circheartfailure.112.967356.
    [25] 潘文志, 舒先红, 宿燕岗, 等. QRS波时限临床意义研究的进展[J]. 中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志, 2007, 05: 448-451. DOI: 10.13333/j.cnki.cjcpe.2007.05.018.

    Pan WZ, Shu XH, Xu YG, et al. Progress in the study of clinical significance of QRS wave duration[J]. Chinese Journal of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, 2007, 05: 448-451, DOI: 10.13333/j.cnki.cjcpe.2007.05.018.
    [26] Alfraidi H, Seifer CM, Hiebert BM, et al. Relation of increasing QRS duration over time and cardiovascular events in outpatients with heart failure[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2019, 124(12): 1907-1911. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.09.018.
    [27] Park HS, Kim H, Park JH, et al. QRS prolongation in the prediction of clinical cardiac events in patients with acute heart failure: analysis of data from the Korean Acute Heart Failure Registry[J]. Cardiology, 2013, 125(2): 96-103. DOI: 10.1159/000348334.
    [28] Jain R, Gautam S, Wu C, et al. Prognostic implications of QRS dispersion for major adverse cardiovascular events in asymptomatic women and men: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis[J]. J Interv Cardiac Electrophysiol, 2019, 56(1): 45-53. DOI: 10.1007/s10840-019-00614-y.
    [29] Yuan X, Zhang H, Zheng Z, et al. Trends in mortality and major complications for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting among Urban Teaching Hospitals in China: 2004 to 2013[J]. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes, 2017, 3(4): 312-318. DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcx021.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  319
  • HTML全文浏览量:  186
  • PDF下载量:  42
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-12-09
  • 修回日期:  2021-02-27
  • 网络出版日期:  2021-08-24
  • 刊出日期:  2021-08-10

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回