Analysis on prevalence and influencing factors of hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy among pregnant women in Jilin Province
-
摘要:
目的 了解吉林省139 414例孕产妇妊娠期高血压疾病(hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy, HDCP)患病率情况,分析其影响因素,为HDCP的预防和科学管理提供理论支持。 方法 采用横断面调查方法,利用以医院为基础的监测系统,收集全省13家监测医院2017年1月1日—2019年12月31日上报的≥20周分娩孕产妇作为研究对象。应用多因素Logistic回归分析模型探讨孕产妇HDCP的影响因素。 结果 本研究孕产妇患HDCP为6 400例,患病率为4.59%。其中患妊娠合并慢性高血压335例、妊娠期高血压1 959例、轻度子痫前期1 278例、重度子痫前期2 843例和子痫21例,患病率分别为0.24%、1.41%、0.92%、2.04%和0.02%。多因素非条件Logistic回归分析模型分析结果显示,年龄≥30岁、孕次≥2次、双胎/三胎的孕产妇与HDCP患病率升高有关;文化程度为高中/中专及以上、产次≥1次的孕产妇与HDCP患病率降低有关。 结论 吉林省孕产妇HDCP患病率低于全国平均水平,其中重度子痫前期患病率最高,建议继续加强基层医疗卫生机构对HDCP的识别和管理。 Abstract:Objective Understanding the prevalence of hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy (HDCP) among 139 414 pregnant women in Jilin Province and analyzing its influencing factors, to provide theoretical supports for the prevention and scientific management of HDCP. Methods Using the cross-sectional survey method, the hospital-based monitoring system was applied to selected the pregnant women who have delivered at 20 or more weeks in 13 monitoring hospitals in Jilin Province from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019, as the research subjects. Multivariate unconditional Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the influencing factors of HDCP in pregnant women. Results In this study, 6 400 cases of HDCP were diagnosed in pregnant women, with a prevalence rate of 4.59%. Among them, the prevalence of pregnancy complicated with chronic hypertension (335 cases), gestational hypertension (1 959 cases), mild preeclampsia (1 278 cases), severe preeclampsia (2 843 cases) and eclampsia (21 cases) was 0.24%, 1.41%, 0.92%, 2.04% and 0.02%, respectively. Multivariate unconditional Logistic regression analysis showed that pregnant women who aged 30 years and older, have two or more pregnancies, have been pregnant with twins/triplets were related to the increased prevalence of HDCP. Pregnant women who have high school/technical secondary school education level or higher and one parity or more were related to the decreased prevalence of HDCP. Conclusions The prevalence of HDCP among pregnant women in Jilin Province is lower than the national average level, among which the prevalence of severe preeclampsia is the highest. It is suggested to continue to strengthen the identification and management of HDCP in primary health care institutions. -
表 1 吉林省2017—2019年孕产妇HDCP患病率
Table 1. The prevalence of HDCP in pregnant women from 2017 to 2019 in Jilin Province
年份
(年)产妇数 慢性高血压合并妊娠 妊娠期高血压 轻度子痫前期 重度子痫前期 子痫 患病数 患病率(%) 患病数 患病率(%) 患病数 患病率(%) 患病数 患病率(%) 患病数 患病率(%) 2017 49 094 136 0.28 756 1.54 468 0.10 997 2.03 10 0.02 2018 42 938 118 0.27 608 1.42 376 0.09 929 2.16 6 0.01 2019 47 382 81 0.17 595 1.26 434 0.09 917 1.94 5 0.01 χ趋势2 8.880 8.504 0.001 0.002 1.316 P值 0.003 0.004 0.974 0.960 0.251 表 2 吉林省不同特征孕产妇HDCP患病率
Table 2. The prevalence of HDCP in pregnant women with different characteristics in Jilin Province
特征 产妇数 HDCP患病数 HDCP患病率(%) χ2值 P值 年龄(岁) 418.987 <0.001 0~<25 17 563 747 4.25 25~<30 62 486 2 414 3.86 30~<35 41 965 1 932 4.60 ≥35 17 400 1 307 7.51 文化程度 43.002 <0.001 初中及以下 28 604 1 475 5.16 高中/中专 38 243 1 835 4.80 大学或以上(含大专) 72 567 3 090 4.26 婚姻状况 0.382 0.537 非在婚 668 34 5.09 在婚 138 746 6 366 4.59 孕次(次) 23.927 <0.001 1 67 177 3 035 4.52 2 40 062 1 734 4.33 ≥3 32 175 1 631 5.07 产次(次) 23.631 <0.001 0 94 084 4 497 4.78 ≥1 45 330 1 903 4.20 剖宫产史 0.147 0.701 无 118 749 5 462 4.60 有 20 665 938 4.54 胎儿数 367.255 <0.001 单胎 137 578 6 145 4.47 双胎/三胎 1 836 255 13.89 表 3 吉林省孕产妇HDCP多因素Logistic回归分析模型分析
Table 3. The multivariate Logistic regression analysis model of HDCP of pregnant women in Jilin Province
因素 β值 sx Wald值 OR(95%CI)值 P值 年龄(岁) 0~<25 1.000 25~<30 -0.023 0.043 0.274 0.978(0.898~1.064) 0.601 30~<35 0.232 0.046 25.879 1.261(1.153~1.379) < 0.001 ≥35 0.825 0.051 262.382 2.283(2.066~2.523) < 0.001 文化程度 初中及以下 1.000 高中/中专 -0.112 0.036 9.484 0.894(0.833~0.960) 0.002 大学或以上(含大专) -0.273 0.034 65.877 0.761(0.712~0.813) < 0.001 孕次(次) 1 1.000 2 0.070 0.035 3.978 1.072(1.001~1.149) 0.046 ≥3 0.196 0.042 21.800 1.216(1.120~1.321) < 0.001 产次(次) 0 1.000 ≥1 -0.518 0.038 181.737 0.596(0.553~0.642) < 0.001 胎儿数 单胎 1.000 双胎/三胎 1.186 0.069 292.310 3.273(2.857~3.750) < 0.001 表 4 吉林省不同年份孕产妇HDCP多因素Logistic回归分析模型分析
Table 4. The multivariate Logistic regression analysis of HDCP of pregnant women in different years in Jilin Province
年份(年) 因素 β值 sx Wald值 OR(95%CI)值 P值 2017 年龄(岁) 0~<25 1.000 25~<30 -0.033 0.068 0.238 0.967(0.846~1.106) 0.626 30~<35 0.169 0.074 5.220 1.184 (1.024~1.368) 0.022 ≥35 0.727 0.080 81.666 2.070(1.768~2.424) < 0.001 文化程度 初中及以下 1.000 高中/中专 0.006 0.057 0.013 1.006(0.901~1.125) 0.909 大学或以上(含大专) -0.263 0.055 22.995 0.769(0.691~0.856) < 0.001 孕次(次) 1 1.000 2 -0.166 0.053 9.734 0.847(0.764~0.940) 0.002 ≥3 -0.098 0.057 2.949 0.906(0.810~1.014) 0.086 胎儿数 单胎 1.000 双胎/三胎 1.256 0.117 116.098 3.511(2.794~4.412) < 0.001 2018 年龄(岁) 1.000 0~<25 25~<30 -0.040 0.077 0.273 0.961(0.826~1.117) 0.601 30~<35 0.219 0.081 7.356 1.245(1.063~1.458) 0.007 ≥35 0.877 0.089 97.783 2.403 (2.020~2.859) < 0.001 文化程度 初中及以下 1.000 高中/中专 -0.163 0.066 6.096 0.850(0.747~0.967) 0.014 大学或以上(含大专) -0.254 0.058 19.052 0.776(0.692~0.870) < 0.001 产次(次) 0 1.000 ≥1 -0.398 0.054 54.323 0.672(0.604~0.747) < 0.001 胎儿数 单胎 1.000 双胎/三胎 1.178 0.118 99.051 3.249(2.576~4.098) < 0.001 2019 年龄(岁) 0~<25 1.000 25~<30 -0.059 0.081 0.533 0.942 (0.804~1.105) 0.466 30~<35 0.217 0.083 6.847 1.242(1.056~1.462) 0.009 ≥35 0.718 0.093 59.299 2.050(1.708~2.461) <0.001 产次(次) 0 1.000 ≥1 -0.420 0.055 58.131 0.657(0.590~0.732) < 0.001 胎儿数 单胎 1.000 双胎/三胎 1.131 0.126 80.987 3.100(2.423~3.966) < 0.001 -
[1] 谢幸, 孔北华, 段涛, 等. 妇产科学[M]. 第8版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018.Xie X, Kong BH, Duan T. Obstetrics and gynecology[M]. 8th ed. Beijing: People's medical publishing house, 2018. [2] Antza C, Cifkova R, Kotsis V, et al. Hypertensive complications of pregnancy: a clinical overview[J]. Metabolism, 2018, 86(9): 102-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2017.11.011. [3] Ukah UV, De Silva DA, Payne B, et al. Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes from pre-eclampsia and other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review[J]. Pregnancy Hypertens, 2018, 11(1): 115-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2017.11.006. [4] Behrens I, Basit S, Melbye M, et al. Risk of post-pregnancy hypertension in women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: nationwide cohort study[J]. BMJ, 2017, 358(7): j3078. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j3078. [5] Tesfa E, Nibret E, Gizaw ST, et al. Prevalence and determinants of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(9): e0239048. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239048. [6] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: ACOG practice bulletin, number 222[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 135(6): 237-260. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003891. [7] Bridwell M, Handzel E, Hynes M, et al. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and maternal and neonatal outcomes in Haiti: the importance of surveillance and data collection[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2019, 19(1): 208. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2361-0. [8] 郭广丽. 河北省产科危重症患病率及危险因素的横断面研究[D]. 唐山: 华北理工大学, 2020.Guo GL. The morbidity and risk factors of maternal near miss disease in Hebei Province: a cross-sectionalsStudy[D]. Tangshan: North China University of Science and Technology, 2020. [9] 李丽, 付强强. 中国妊娠期高血压疾病患病率的Meta分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2019, 35(14): 3378-3381. DOI: 10.7620/zgfybj.j.issn.1001-4411.2019.14.72.Li L, Fu QQ. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy in China[J]. Matern Child Heal Care China, 2019, 34(14): 3378-3381. DOI: 10.7620/zgfybj.j.issn.1001-4411.2019.14.72. [10] Meazaw MW, Chojenta C, Muluneh MD, et al. Factors associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic and meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(8): e0237476. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237476. [11] 冯永亮, 彭婷婷, 王芳, 等. 妊娠期高血压疾病对出生结局的影响及相关因素[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2014, 18(2): 131-134. http://zhjbkz.ahmu.edu.cn/article/id/JBKZ201402012Feng YL, Peng TT, Wang F, et al. Impact of hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy on birth outcomes and its potential risk factors[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2014, 18(2): 131-134. http://zhjbkz.ahmu.edu.cn/article/id/JBKZ201402012 [12] Kilpatrick SJ, Abreo A, Gould J, et al. Confirmed severe maternal morbidity is associated with high rate of preterm delivery[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 215(2): 233. e1-233. e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.026. [13] 聂晓露, 付帅, 刘玉昆, 等. 高龄孕妇合并妊娠期高血压疾病妊娠结局的临床分析[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2020, 9(2): 101-105. DOI: 10.3877/cma.J.issn.2095-3259.2020.02.009.Nie XL, Fu S, Liu YK, et al. Clinical analysis the pregnant outcomes of women of advanced age with hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy[J]. Chin J Obstet Emerg Electron Ed, 2020, 9(2): 101-105. DOI: 10.3877/cma.J.issn.2095-3259.2020.02.009. [14] 中华医学会心血管病学分会女性心脏健康学组, 中华医学会心血管病学分会高血压学组. 妊娠期高血压疾病血压管理专家共识(2019)[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2020, 48(3): 195-204. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20191024-00652.Women's Heart Health Group of Chinese Society of Cardiology of Chinese Medical Association, Hypertension Group of Chinese Society of Cardiology of Chinese Medical Association. Expert consensus on blood pressure management in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy(2019)[J]. Chin J Cardiol, 2020, 48(3): 195-204. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20191024-00652. [15] Dayan N, Lanes A, Mark MC, et al. Effect of chronic hypertension on assisted pregnancy outcomes: a population-based study in Ontario, Canada[J]. Fertil Steril, 2016, 105(4): 1003-1009. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.11.039. [16] 孟凡文, 陈森, 刘亚山, 等. 河北省5县区妊娠期高血压疾病的发病情况及危险因素分析[J]. 中国生育健康杂志, 2015, 26(2): 112-115. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-878X.2015.02.004.Meng FW, Chen S, Liu YS, et al. Incidence and risk factors of hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy in 5 counties of Hebei Province[J]. Chin J Reproductive Heal, 2015, 26(2): 112-115. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-878X.2015.02.004.