The moderated mediating effect of stressful life events on non-suicidal self-injury in Chinese adolescents
-
摘要:
目的 探究负强化在应激性生活事件通过负性情绪激发青少年非自杀性自伤(non-suicidal self-injury, NSSI)过程中的调节作用。 方法 采用一般资料调查表、青少年生活事件量表(adolescent self-rating life events checklist, ASLEC)、积极情感消极情感量表(positive affect and negative affect scale, PANAS)、青少年非自杀性自伤行为评定问卷(adolescent non-suicidal self-injury assessment questionnaire, ANSAQ)对4 634名青少年进行匿名调查, 运用结构方程模型分析有调节的中介效应。 结果 青少年NSSI检出率为29.80%。应激性生活事件、负性情绪和NSSI两两间均呈正相关(均有P < 0.01), 负强化与NSSI正相关(P=0.002)。负性情绪在应激性生活事件与NSSI间起中介作用(IE=0.116, 95% CI: 0.090~0.143)。负强化不仅正向调节负性情绪与NSSI的关系(β=0.165, 95% CI: 0.101~0.227), 还可正向调节负性情绪在应激性生活事件与NSSI间的中介效应[中介效应差异比较的3个95%CI分别为(0.090~0.241)、(0.049~0.217)、(0.090~0.241)]。 结论 在应激性生活事件与NSSI间存在有调节的中介效应, 负性情绪发挥中介作用, 负强化不仅恶化负性情绪对NSSI的影响、还加剧应激性生活事件通过负性情绪对NSSI的影响。 Abstract:Objective To explore the moderating role of negative reinforcement in the process of adolescent's non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) stimulated by stressful life events through negative affect. Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted among 4 634 adolescents by using general situation questionnaire, adolescent self-rating life events checklist (ASLEC), positive affect and negative affect scale (PANAS), adolescent non-suicidal self-injury assessment questionnaire (ANSAQ), and using structural equation modeling to test the moderated mediating effect. Results The detection rate of adolescents'NSSI was about 29.80%. Stressful life events, negative affect and NSSI were positive correlated with each others (all P < 0.01), negative reinforcement was positively correlated with NSSI (P=0.002). Negative affect played a mediating role between stressful life events and NSSI (IE=0.116, 95% CI: 0.090-0.143). Negative reinforcement not only positively moderate the relationship between negative affect and NSSI (β=0.165, 95% CI: 0.101-0.227), but also positively moderate the mediating effect of negative affect between stressful life events and NSSI[95%CI of Indirect effects comparison are (0.090-0.241), (0.049-0.217), (0.090-0.241)]. Conclusion There is a moderated mediating effect between stressful life events and NSSI, negative affect is the mediator, negative reinforcement not only exacerbate the impact of negative affect on NSSI, but also exacerbate the impact of stressful life events on NSSI through negative affect. -
表 1 NSSI的人口学分布[n(%)]
Table 1. The demographic distribution of NSSI [n(%)]
人口学特征 无NSSI 有NSSI χ2值 P值 性别 6.595 0.010 女 1 642(68.53) 754(31.47) 男 1 611(71.98) 627(28.02) 学段 52.788 < 0.001 初中 1 458(65.15) 780(34.85) 高中 1 795(74.92) 601(25.08) 生源地 2.099 0.147 农村 1 762(69.32) 780(30.68) 城市 1 491(71.27) 601(28.73) 独生子女 3.737 0.053 是 2 421(70.98) 990(29.02) 否 832(68.03) 391(31.97) 表 2 负性情绪的中介效应检验
Table 2. Indirect effects of negative affect
路径 Std. Boot SE Bias-Corrected 95% CI LLCI ULCI 总效应 应激性生活事件→NSSI 0.374 0.027 0.320 0.427 直接效应 应激性生活事件→负性情绪 0.398 0.026 0.346 0.449 负性情绪→NSSI 0.292 0.032 0.230 0.355 应激性生活事件→NSSI 0.258 0.031 0.197 0.320 间接效应 应激性生活事件→负性情绪→NSSI 0.116 0.014 0.090 0.143 注:Bootstrap重复抽样5 000次。 表 3 负强化的调节作用
Table 3. Moderating effect of negative reinforcement
负强化的条件值 Std. Boot SE Bias-Corrected 95% CI LLCI ULCI 负强化×负性情绪→NSSI 0.165 0.032 0.101 0.227 直接效应=负性情绪→NSSI 1.负强化=M-SD 0.160 0.031 0.098 0.221 2.负强化=M 0.325 0.030 0.266 0.384 3.负强化=M+SD 0.490 0.033 0.425 0.555 间接效应=应激性生活事件→负性情绪→NSSI 4.负强化=M-SD 0.064 0.017 0.031 0.097 5.负强化=M 0.131 0.014 0.105 0.158 6.负强化=M+SD 0.197 0.016 0.166 0.228 两两比较 3 vs. 2 0.165 0.039 0.090 0.241 3 vs. 1 0.330 0.079 0.175 0.485 2 vs. 1 0.165 0.039 0.090 0.241 6 vs. 5 0.066 0.021 0.025 0.107 6 vs. 4 0.133 0.043 0.049 0.217 5 vs. 4 0.066 0.021 0.025 0.107 注:Bootstrap重复抽样5 000次。 -
[1] 辛秀红, 姚树桥. 青少年生活事件量表效度与信度的再评价及常模更新[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2015, 29(5): 355-360. DOI:10.3969 /j.issn.1000-6729.2015.05.010.Xin XH, Yao SQ. Validity and reliability of the Adolescent Self-rating Life Events Checklist in middle school students [J]. Chin Mental Health J, 2015, 29(5): 355-360. DOI:10.3969 /j.issn.1000-6729.2015.05.010. [2] Chen F, Zheng D, Liu J, et al. Depression and anxiety among adolescents during COVID-19: A cross-sectional study [J]. Brain Behav Immun, 2020, 88: 36-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.061. [3] Jiao WY, Wang LN, Liu J, et al. Behavioral and Emotional Disorders in Children during the COVID-19 Epidemic [J]. J Pediatr, 2020, 221: 264-266. e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.03.013. [4] 韦臻, 王若彤, 胡燕, 等. 新冠疫情期间学生心理应激反应与非自杀性自伤行为: 有调节的中介模型[J]. 华南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 53(3): 122-128. DOI: 10.6054/j.jscnun.2021000.Wei Z, Wang RT, Hu Y, et al. The Impact of Psychological Stress Response on Non-suicidal Self-injury Behaviors in Adolescents during COVID-19 [J]. Journal of South China Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2021, 53(3): 122-128. DOI: 10.6054/j.jscnun.2021000. [5] Plener PL. COVID-19 and Nonsuicidal Self-Injury: The Pandemic's Influence on an Adolescent Epidemic [J]. Am J Public Health, 2021, 111(2): 195-196. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.306037. [6] Tang WC, Lin MP, You J, et al. Prevalence and psychosocial risk factors of nonsuicidal self-injury among adolescents during the COVID-19 outbreak [J]. Curr Psychol, 2021: 1-10. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-021-01931-0. [7] Hu Z, Yu H, Zou J, et al. Relationship among self-injury, experiential avoidance, cognitive fusion, anxiety, and depression in Chinese adolescent patients with nonsuicidal self-injury [J]. Brain Behav, 2021, 11(12): e2419. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2419. [8] Plener PL, Kaess M, Schmahl C, et al. Nonsuicidal self-injury in adolescents [J]. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2018, 115(3): 23-30. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0023. [9] Brown RC, Plener PL. Non-suicidal self-injury in adolescence [J]. Curr Psychiatry Rep, 2017, 19(3): 20. DOI: 10.1007/s11920-017-0767-9. [10] Nielsen E, Sayal K, Townsend E. Functional coping dynamics and experiential avoidance in a community sample with no self-injury vs. non-suicidal self-injury only vs. those with both non-suicidal self-injury and suicidal behaviour [J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2017, 14(6): 575. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14060575. [11] Greene D, Hasking P, Boyes M. The associations between alexithymia, non-suicidal self-injury, and risky drinking: The moderating roles of experiential avoidance and biological sex [J]. Stress Health, 2019, 35(4): 457-467. DOI: 10.1002/smi.2879. [12] Anderson NL, Crowther JH. Using the experiential avoidance model of non-suicidal self-injury: understanding who stops and who continues [J]. Arch Suicide Res, 2012, 16(2): 124-134. DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2012.667329. [13] Angelakis I, Gooding P. Experiential avoidance in non-suicidal self-injury and suicide experiences: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Suicide Life Threat Behav, 2021, 51(5): 978-992. DOI: 10.1111/sltb.12784. [14] 王泉泉, 魏铭, 刘霞. 青少年自伤行为的机制及影响因素: 基于情绪管理的视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(6): 759-768. DOI:10.16187 /j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2017.06.15.Wang QQ, Wei M, Liu X. The psychological mechanism and influential factors of adolescent NSSI: An emotion regulation perspective [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2017, 33(6): 759-768. DOI:10.16187 /j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2017.06.15. [15] 邱林, 郑雪, 王雁飞. 积极情感消极情感量表(PANAS)的修订[J]. 应用心理学, 2008, 14(3): 249-254, 268. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXNX200803009.htmQiu L, Zheng X, Wang YF. Revision of the Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scale [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008, 14(3): 249-254, 268. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXNX200803009.htm [16] 万宇辉, 刘婉, 郝加虎, 等. 青少年非自杀性自伤行为评定问卷的编制及其信效度评价[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2018, 39(2): 170-173. DOI: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2018.02.005.Wan YH, Liu W, Hao JH, et al. Fangbiao. Development and evaluation on reliability and validity of Adolescent Non-suicidal Self-injury Assessment Questionnaire [J]. J Chin School Health, 2018, 39(2): 170-173. DOI: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2018.02.005. [17] 温忠麟, 黄彬彬, 汤丹丹. 问卷数据建模前传[J]. 心理科学, 2018, 41(1): 204-210. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20180130.Wen ZL, Huang BB, Tang DD. Preliminary work for modeling questionnaire data [J]. Journal of Psychological Science, 2018, 41(1): 204-210. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20180130. [18] 方杰, 温忠麟. 基于结构方程模型的有调节的中介效应分析[J]. 心理科学, 2018, 41(2): 453-458. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20180231.Fang J, Wen ZL. The analyses of moderated mediation effects based on structural equation modeling [J]. Journal of Psychological Science, 2018, 41(2): 453-458. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20180231. [19] MacKinnon DP, Valente MJ, Gonzalez O. The correspondence between causal and traditional mediation analysis: the link is the mediator by treatment interaction [J]. Prev Sci, 2020, 21(2): 147-157. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-019-01076-4. [20] Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling[J]. Canadian Studies in Population, 2018, 45(3-4): 188-195. DOI: 10.25336/csp29418. [21] 吴艳, 温忠麟, 李碧. 潜变量交互效应模型标准化估计中的检验问题[J]. 心理学探新, 2014, 34(3): 260-264. DOI:1003-5184(2014) 030260-05.Wu Y, Wen ZL, Li B. Testing the Standardized Solutions in Structural Equation Models with Interaction Effects[J]. Psychological Exploration, 2014, 34(3): 260-264. DOI:1003-5184(2014) 030260-05. [22] 韩阿珠, 徐耿, 苏普玉. 中国大陆中学生非自杀性自伤流行特征的Meta分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2017, 38(11): 1665-1670. DOI: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2017.11.019.Han AZ, Xu G, Su PY. A Meta-analysis of characteristics of non-suicidal self-injury among middle school students in mainland China[J]. J Chin School Health, 2017, 38(11): 1665-1670. DOI: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2017.11.019. [23] Hankin BL, Mermelstein R, Roesch L. Sex differences in adolescent depression: stress exposure and reactivity models[J]. Child Dev, 2007, 78(1): 279-295. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00997.x. [24] 张珊珊, 张野. 父母心理控制与非自杀性自伤行为的关系: 校园欺凌的中介作用[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2019, 23(4): 459-463. DOI: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2019.04.018.Zhang SS, Zhang Y. The impact of parental psychological control on non-suicidal self-injury: the role of campus bullying as a mediator[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2019, 23(4): 459-463. DOI: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2019.04.018. [25] Gao Y, Wang H, Liu X, et al. Associations between stressful life events, non-suicidal self-injury, and depressive symptoms among Chinese rural-to-urban children: A three-wave longitudinal study[J]. Stress Health, 2020, 36(4): 522-532. DOI: 10.1002/smi.2954. [26] Nielsen E, Sayal K, Townsend E. Exploring the Relationship between Experiential Avoidance, Coping Functions and the Recency and Frequency of Self-Harm[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(7): e0159854. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159854. [27] Brereton A, McGlinchey E. Self-harm, Emotion Regulation, and Experiential Avoidance: A Systematic Review[J]. Arch Suicide Res, 2020, 24(sup1): 1-24. DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2018.1563575. [28] Liu H, Wang W, Yang J, et al. The effects of alexithymia, experiential avoidance, and childhood sexual abuse on non-suicidal self-injury and suicidal ideation among Chinese college students with a history of childhood sexual abuse[J]. J Affect Disord, 2021, 282: 272-279. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.181. [29] 张连生, 朱双双, 常薇. 情绪调节困难和留守时间在大学生自伤行为关系中的中介和调节效应[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2018, 22(4): 367-370. DOI: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2018.04.011.Zhang LS, Zhu SS, Chang W. The mediating and moderating effects of emotional dysregulation and left-behind experiences for college freshmen's self-injurious behavior[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2018, 22(4): 367-370. DOI: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2018.04.011. [30] Sung G, Park Y, Choi TK, et al. Implicit theories and depression in clinical and non-clinical samples: The mediating role of experiential avoidance[J]. Curr Psychol, 2020, 39(1): 68-73. [31] 胡燕, 徐慧琼, 万宇辉, 等. 安徽省中学生非自杀性自伤行为现状及其影响因素[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2020, 24(8): 923-928. DOI: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2020.08.012.Hu Y, Xu HQ, Wan YH, et al. The status and influencing factors of non-suicidal self-injury among middle school students in Anhui Province[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2020, 24(8): 923-928. DOI: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2020.08.012.