• 中国精品科技期刊
  • 《中文核心期刊要目总览》收录期刊
  • RCCSE 中国核心期刊(5/114,A+)
  • Scopus收录期刊
  • 美国《化学文摘》(CA)收录期刊
  • WHO 西太平洋地区医学索引(WPRIM)收录期刊
  • 《中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)》核心库期刊 (C)
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 《日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(中国)》(JSTChina)收录期刊
  • 美国《乌利希期刊指南》(UIrichsweb)收录期刊
  • 中华预防医学会系列杂志优秀期刊(2019年)

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于倾向性评分匹配法探索社会活动参与对老年人健康的影响

赵创艺 杨媛 袁空军 周光清 李海燕

赵创艺, 杨媛, 袁空军, 周光清, 李海燕. 基于倾向性评分匹配法探索社会活动参与对老年人健康的影响[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2023, 27(8): 974-978. doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2023.08.017
引用本文: 赵创艺, 杨媛, 袁空军, 周光清, 李海燕. 基于倾向性评分匹配法探索社会活动参与对老年人健康的影响[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2023, 27(8): 974-978. doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2023.08.017
ZHAO Chuangyi, YANG Yuan, YUAN Kongjun, ZHOU Guangqing, LI Haiyan. Impact of social activity participation on the health of the elderly: based on propensity score matching method[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION, 2023, 27(8): 974-978. doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2023.08.017
Citation: ZHAO Chuangyi, YANG Yuan, YUAN Kongjun, ZHOU Guangqing, LI Haiyan. Impact of social activity participation on the health of the elderly: based on propensity score matching method[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION, 2023, 27(8): 974-978. doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2023.08.017

基于倾向性评分匹配法探索社会活动参与对老年人健康的影响

doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2023.08.017
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金 U1132001

广东省科技计划项目 2017A030223004

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    李海燕,E-mail:lhy@smu.edu.cn

    周光清,E-mail:13318898668@189.cn

  • 中图分类号: R161.7

Impact of social activity participation on the health of the elderly: based on propensity score matching method

Funds: 

National Natural Science Foundation of China U1132001

Guangdong Science and Technology Project 2017A030223004

More Information
  • 摘要:   目的  研究社会活动参与对老年人健康的影响。  方法  采用2018年中国健康与养老追踪调查(China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, CHARLS)的调查数据,运用倾向性评分匹配法(propensity score matching, PSM)、logistic回归分析模型和工具变量法进行分析。  结果  logistic回归分析模型分析结果显示,匹配前社会活动参与对老年人抑郁的影响无统计学意义,参与社会活动的老年人日常生活活动能力受损的风险是未参与社会活动老年人的0.795倍(OR=0.795, 95% CI: 0.712~0.889, P<0.001)。匹配后参与社会活动的老年人患抑郁或日常生活活动能力受损的可能性均低于未参与社会活动的老年人(OR=0.971, 95% CI: 0.964~0.978, P<0.001; OR=0.689, 95% CI: 0.628~0.889, P<0.001)。两阶段最小二乘法(two stage least square, 2SLS)回归结果显示,社会活动参与对老年人抑郁和日常生活活动能力受损均有抑制作用(β=-19.622, P<0.001; β=-3.999, P<0.001)。  结论  社会活动参与有利于改善老年人的日常生活活动能力和减少抑郁情绪,应采取措施提高老年人的社会活动参与度,促进健康老龄化。
  • 表  1  PSM前后研究对象特征比较

    Table  1.   Comparison of the characteristics of the study subjects before and after PSM

    变量Variable PSM匹配前Before PSM PSM匹配后After PSM
    参与社会活动
    Participate in social activities(n=4 886)
    未参与社会活动
    Not participatingin social activities(n=5 537)
    t/χ2
    value
    P
    value
    参与社会活动
    Participate in social activities(n=3 765)
    未参与社会活动
    Not participating in social activities(n=3 765)
    t/χ2
    value
    P
    value
    年龄组/岁, x ±s Age group/year, x ±s 68.55±6.80 69.90±7.43 -9.513 <0.001 68.82±6.89 69.12±7.18 -1.843 0.065
    性别Sex 0.779 0.377 0.065 0.799
      男Male 2 357(48.24) 2 719(49.11) 1 690(44.89) 1 701(45.18)
      女Female 2 529(51.76) 2 818(50.89) 2 075(55.11) 2 064(54.82)
    居住地Residence 197.099 <0.001 0.328 0.567
      城市Urban 1 607(32.96) 1 146(20.78) 1 019(27.07) 997(26.48)
      农村Rural 3 268(67.04) 4 368(79.22) 2 746(72.93) 2 768(73.52)
    婚姻状态Marriage 5.482 0.140 2.288 0.515
      已婚Married 3 856(78.92) 4 319(78.00) 2 955(78.49) 2 968(78.83)
      离异Divorce 48(0.98) 50(0.90) 33(0.88) 38(1.01)
      丧偶Widowed 956(19.57) 1 119(20.21) 759(20.16) 733(19.47)
      未婚Unmarried 26(0.53) 49(0.89) 18(0.47) 26(0.69)
    教育水平Education 265.955 <0.001 1.693 0.638
      文盲Llliteracy 2 302(47.11) 3 329(60.12) 1 977(52.51) 2 027(53.84)
      小学Primary school 1 059(21.68) 1 142(20.63) 880(23.37) 838(22.26)
      初中Junior middle school 874(17.89) 733(13.24) 614(16.31) 607(16.12)
      高中及以上High school and above 651(13.32) 333(6.01) 294(7.81) 293(7.78)
    吸烟Smoking 6.154 0.013 0.377 0.539
      是Yes 1 754(39.72) 1 811(37.19) 1 484(39.42) 1 458(38.73)
      否No 2 662(60.28) 3 058(62.81) 2 281(60.58) 2 307(61.27)
    饮酒Drinking 70.839 <0.001 1.566 0.211
      是Yes 1 704(34.88) 1 509(27.25) 1 174(31.18) 1 124(29.85)
      否No 3 181(65.12) 4 028(72.75) 2 591(68.82) 2 641(70.15)
    注:PSM, 倾向性评分匹配法。
    ①以[人数(占比/%)]表示。
    Note: PSM, propensity score matching.
    ① [Number of people (proportion /%)].
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  社会活动参与对老年人身心健康影响的logistic回归分析模型分析

    Table  2.   Logistic model of the impact of social activity participation on the physical and mental health of the elderly

    PSM 变量Variable 抑郁Depression 日常生活活动能力Activities of daily living
    β值value OR值(95% CI)OR value (95% CI) P值value β值value OR值(95% CI)OR value (95% CI) P值value
    匹配前Before PSM 常量Constant -0.454 0.635 <0.001 1.429 4.176 <0.001
    社会活动参与
    Social activity participation
    -0.026 0.974(0.900~1.054) 0.519 -0.229 0.795(0.712~0.889) <0.001
    匹配后After PSM 常量Constant -1.793 0.172 <0.001 1.311 3.710 <0.001
    社会活动参与
    Social activity participation
    -0.29 0.971(0.964~0.978) 0.004 -0.373 0.689(0.628~0.889) <0.001
    注:PSM, 倾向性评分匹配法。
    Note: PSM, propensity score matching.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  社会活动参与对老年人身心健康影响的2SLS模型

    Table  3.   2SLS model of the impact of social activity participation on the physical and mental health of the elderly

    变量Variable 抑郁Depression 日常生活活动能力Activities of Daily Living
    OLS 2SLS OLS 2SLS
    一阶段One Step 二阶段Two Step 一阶段One Step 二阶段Two Step
    工具变量Instrumental variables 0.070 0.070
    社会活动参与Social activity participation -0.209 -19.622 -1.140 -3.999
    性别Sex 1.351 0.094 3.194 1.424 0.094 1.687
    年龄Age -0.134 -0.005 -0.238 0.187 -0.005 0.172
    居住地Residence 0.643 -0.100 -1.313 0.417 -0.100 0.132
    教育水平Educatiom -0.209 0.065 1.096 -0.335 0.065 -0.147
    婚姻状态Marriage 0.159 0.021 0.538 0.217 0.021 0.272
    吸烟Smoking -0.023 0.032 0.593 0.333 0.032 0.423
    饮酒Drinking -0.192 0.090 1.581 -1.119 0.090 -0.864
    常量Constant 14.812 0.648 28.294 -10.069 0.648 -8.113
    一阶段FF value of the One Step 62.493 62.493
    注:2SLS, 两阶段最小二乘法;OLS, 普通最小二乘法。
    P<0.05。② P<0.001。③ P<0.01。
    2SLS, two stage least square; OLS, ordinary least squares.
    P<0.05. ② P<0.001. ③ P<0.01.
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 中华人民共和国民政部. 2010年民政事业发展统计公报[EB/OL]. (2011-06-16)[2021-12-15]. https://www.mca.gov.cn/n156/n189/c93364/content.html.

    Ministry of Civil Affairs of the People's Republic of China. Statistical bulletin on the development of civil affairs in 2010[EB/OL]. (2011-06-16)[2021-12-15]. https://www.mca.gov.cn/n156/n189/c93364/content.html.
    [2] 中华人民共和国民政部. 2019年民政事业发展统计公报[EB/OL]. (2020-09-08)[2021-12-15]. https://www.mca.gov.cn/images3/www2017/file/202009/1601261242921.pdf

    Ministry of Civil Affairs of the People's Republic of China. Statistical bulletin of civil affairs development in 2019[EB/OL]. (2020-09-08)[2021-12-15]. https://www.mca.gov.cn/images3/www2017/file/202009/1601261242921.pdf
    [3] Sun J, Lyu X, Lyu S, et al. The effect of social participation on income-related inequality in health outcome among Chinese older adults[J]. Int Health, 2021, 13(1): 80-88. DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa023.
    [4] 刘庆. 社会活动参与、自我效能感与深圳流动中老年人的生活满意度[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2020, 40(16): 3559-3561. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2020.16.059.

    Liu Q. Social activity participation, self-efficacy and life satisfaction of migrant middle-aged and elderly people in Shenzhen[J]. Chin J Gerontol, 2020, 40(16): 3559-3561. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2020.16.059.
    [5] 李甘, 郭雁飞, 黄哲宙, 等. 中国50岁及以上人群社会参与度和抑郁的关联研究[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2020, 24(4): 399-403. DOI: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2020.04.006.

    Li G, Guo YF, Huang ZZ, et al. Social engagement and depression among Chinese aged 50 years and older[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2020, 24(4): 399-403. DOI: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2020.04.006.
    [6] Su D, Chen Z, Chang J, et al. Effect of social participation on the physical functioning and depression of empty-nest elderly in China: evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Survey (CHARLS)[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17(24): 9438. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17249438.
    [7] Zhao Y, Hu Y, Smith JP, et al. Cohort profile: the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS)[J]. Int J Epidemiol, 2014, 43(1): 61-68. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dys203.
    [8] Jiang CH, Zhu F, Qin TT. Relationships between chronic diseases and depression among middle-aged and elderly people in China: a prospective study from CHARLS[J]. Curr Med Sci, 2020, 40(5): 858-870. DOI: 10.1007/s11596-020-2270-5.
    [9] Haukoos JS, Lewis RJ. The propensity score[J]. JAMA, 2015, 314(15): 1637-1638. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.13480.
    [10] 陈云松. 逻辑、想象和诠释: 工具变量在社会科学因果推断中的应用[J]. 社会学研究, 2012, 27(6): 192-216. DOI: 10.19934/j.cnki.shxyj.2012.06.009.

    Chen YS. Logic, imagination and interpretation: the application of instrumental variables in causal inference in Social Sciences[J]. Sociol Stud, 2012, 27(6): 192-216. DOI: 10.19934/j.cnki.shxyj.2012.06.009.
    [11] 邱红, 魏雅鑫. 我国老年人参与社会活动及影响因素分析[J]. 人口学刊, 2020, 42(5): 73-82. DOI: 10.16405/j.cnki.1004-129X.2020.05.006.

    Qiu H, Wei YX. Analysis on the participation of the elderly in social activities and its influencing factors in China[J]. Popul J, 2020, 42(5): 73-82. DOI: 10.16405/j.cnki.1004-129X.2020.05.006.
    [12] Courtin E, Knapp M. Social isolation, loneliness and health in old age: a scoping review[J]. Health Soc Care Community, 2017, 25(3): 799-812. DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12311.
    [13] Wang R, Feng Z, Liu Y, et al. Relationship between neighbourhood social participation and depression among older adults: A longitudinal study in China[J]. Health Soc Care Community, 2020, 28(1): 247-259. DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12859.
    [14] Gao M, Sa Z, Li Y, et al. Does social participation reduce the risk of functional disability among older adults in China? A survival analysis using the 2005-2011 waves of the CLHLS data[J]. BMC Geriatr, 2018, 18(1): 224. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-018-0903-3.
    [15] 谢立黎, 汪斌. 积极老龄化视野下中国老年人社会参与模式及影响因素[J]. 人口研究, 2019, 43(3): 17-30. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RKYZ201903002.htm

    Xie LL, Wang B. Social participation profile of the Chinese elderly in the context of active ageing: patterns and determinants[J]. Popul Res, 2019, 43(3): 17-30. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RKYZ201903002.htm
    [16] 刘西国. 社交活动如何影响农村老年人生活满意度[J]. 人口与经济, 2016(2): 40-47. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4149.2016.02.005.

    Liu XG. How does social activities affect the rural elderly life satisfaction[J]. Popul Econ, 2016(2): 40-47. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4149.2016.02.005.
  • 加载中
表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  171
  • HTML全文浏览量:  46
  • PDF下载量:  17
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-12-23
  • 修回日期:  2022-04-28
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-09-02
  • 刊出日期:  2023-08-10

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回