Evaluation of individualized medication under the guidance of genetic testing in the management of hypertension patients in rural areas
-
摘要:
目的 研究基因检测指导用药与家庭医生相结合的管理模式在农村原发性高血压患者中的应用成效。 方法 将安徽农村209例原发性高血压患者分为试验组(105人)和对照组(104人)。在家庭医生签约模式下,对试验组结合个体化用药基因检测结果指导用药,对照组实施常规用药。经6个月干预,观察两组患者的治疗依从性、药物不良反应率、血压值和体重指数(body mass index,BMI)、空腹血糖(fasting blood glucose,FBG)、血清总胆固醇(total cholesterol,TC)和甘油三酯(triglycerides,TG)的变化。 结果 干预6个月后,试验组患者的服药依从性明显高于对照组,血压值和药物不良反应率明显低于对照组;干预3个月后,两组患者的BMI、FBG、TC和TG均无明显下降,干预6个月后,试验组FBG、TC和TG均有明显下降,对照组仅FBG值有明显下降,两组患者的BMI值均无明显变化。 结论 家庭医生签约服务模式下,基因检测指导用药能提高原发性高血压患者的服药依从性,降低药物不良反应率,提高治疗效率。 Abstract:Objective This study combined genotyping with family doctors' contracting model to assess the application of precision medicine in rural patients with essential hypertension. Methods In this study, 209 hypertensive patients from 3 villages in Lujiang County, Hefei City, Anhui Province were selected as subjects and randomly divided into experimental group(n=105) and control group(n=104). The medication regimen of observation group was guided by genetic testing for gene sensitivity to antihypertensive drugs, and the control group was implemented routine pharmacy. All the patients were managed by family doctors. Adverse drug reaction rate, treatment compliance, blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), fasting blood glucose (FBG), cholesterol (TC), and triglycerides (TG) of the two groups were analyzed, respectively, during the 6-month intervention. Results After 6-month of intervention, the medication compliance of the experimental group were significantly higher than that of the control group, and the blood pressure and adverse drug reaction rate were significantly lower than that of the control group. After 3 months of intervention, there was no significant decrease in BMI, FBG, TC and TG in the two groups. After 6 months of intervention, the FBG, TC and TG of the experimental group were significantly decreased, while only the FBG value of the control group was significantly decreased. There were no significant changes in body mass index (BMI) values in both groups. Conclusions Individualized medication guided by genotyping can improve the treatment compliance, reduce the adverse drug reaction rate, and improve the treatment efficiency of patients with essential hypertension. -
Key words:
- Gene test /
- Family doctors contracted services /
- Rural areas /
- Essential hypertension
-
表 1 高血压个体化用药基因检测位点
Table 1. Individualized drug detection site for hypertension
药物分类 药物名称 相关基因 检测位点 ACEI 依那普利 NR3C2 rs5186 赖诺普利 ACE rs4291 卡托普利 ACE2 rs2106809 培哚普利 AGTR1 rs1801253 咪达普利/贝那普利 CYP11B2 rs1801253 ARB 雷米普利 ACE rs4344 氯沙坦厄贝沙坦 CYP2C9 rs1801253 替米沙坦 GNB3 rs5186 坎地沙坦 CYP11B2 rs1801253 奥美沙坦酯 SLCO1B1 rs5186 β受体阻滞剂 阿替洛尔/比索洛尔 ADRB1 rs1801253 美托洛尔/美托洛尔缓释片/卡维地洛 CYP2D6 rs1065852 CCB 氨氯地平/左旋氨氯地平 CYP3A5 rs776746 ACE rs4291 硝苯地平/硝苯地平缓释片 ADRA1A rs2106809 硝苯地平控释片/尼群地平 AGTR1 rs1801253 利尿剂 氢氯噻嗪 YEATS4 rs7297610 NEDD4L rs5186 表 2 两组患者的一般人口学基本信息比较[n(%)]
Table 2. Comparison of general basic information between the two groups[n(%)]
变量 试验组(n=105) 对照组(n=104) χ2值 P值 性别 0.249 0.618 男 58(55.24) 61(58.65) 女 47(44.76) 43(41.35) 年龄(岁) 0.402 0.818 35~ 17(16.19) 15(14.42) 56~ 54(51.43) 58(55.77) ≥76 34(32.38) 31(28.81) 婚姻状况 0.119 0.731 在婚 87(82.86) 88(84.62) 其他 18(17.14) 16(15.38) 文化程度 1.570 0.666 小学及以下 16(15.24) 17(16.35) 初中 47(44.76) 49(47.12) 高中或中专 31(29.52) 28(26.92) 大专及以上 11(10.48) 10(9.62) 月均收入(元) 0.390 0.823 < 500 20(19.05) 23(22.12) 500~ 58(55.24) 57(54.80) ≥1 000 27(25.71) 24(23.08) 患病年限(年) 1.552 0.460 < 5 53(50.48) 49(47.11) 5~ 41(39.05) 38(36.54) ≥10 11(10.47) 17(16.35) 高血压分级 0.822 0.884 低危 9(8.57) 9(8.65) 中危 55(52.38) 51(49.04) 高危 34(32.38) 39(37.50) 很高危 7(6.67) 5(4.81) 高血压控制率 21(20.00) 22(21.15) 0.043 0.866 表 3 试验组患者15个相关基因位点基因型及基因频率分布
Table 3. The allele frequencies for the 15 related SNPs in patients of the experimental group
碱基位点 相关基因型
/n(%)基因 野生型 杂合变异 纯合变异 rs4291 ACE AA/30(28.57) AT/58(55.24) TT/17(16.19) rs1057910 CYP2C9 AA/90(85.71) AC/9(8.57) CC/6(5.71) rs1065852 CYP2D6 AA/25(23.81) AG/64(60.95) GG/16(15.24) rs1801253 ADRB1 CC/44(41.90) CG/49(46.67) GG/12(11.43) rs1799998 CYP11B2 AA/54(51.43) AG/48(45.71) GG/3(2.86) rs4149601 NEDD4L GG/66(62.86) GA/33(31.43) AA/6(5.71) rs2106809 ACE2 AA/42(40.00) GA/24(22.86) GG/39(37.14) rs1048101 ADRA1A GG/77(73.33) GA/26(24.76) AA/2(1.90) rs776746 CYP3A5 CC/45(42.86) CT/51(48.57) TT/9(8.57) rs7297610 YEATS4 CC/95(90.48) CT/7(6.67) TT/3(2.86) rs4344 ACE AA/47(44.76) AG/41(39.05) GG/17(16.19) rs5522 NR3C2 TT/65(61.91) TC/33(31.43) CC/7(6.67) rs4149056 SLCO1B1 TT/86(81.90) TC/11(10.48) CC/8(7.62) rs5186 AGTR1 AA/88(83.81) AC/11(10.48) CC/6(5.71) rs5443 GNB3 TT/32(30.48) TC/57(54.29) CC/16(15.24) 表 4 两组各指标比较(x±s)
Table 4. Comparison of indicators between the two groups (x±s)
项目 时间(月) 试验组 对照组 F值 P值 组别 时间 组别×时间 组别 时间 组别×时间 收缩压(mmHg) 0 150.20±11.86 151.08±11.68 1.999 240.972 18.957 0.160 < 0.001 < 0.001 3 139.43±9.24b 144.85±8.75b 16.988 < 0.001 6 133.67±7.85b 139.93±8.29b 28.513 < 0.001 舒张压(mmHg) 0 96.09±7.55 96.73±9.81 1.226 1 009.375 224.591 0.271 < 0.001 < 0.001 3 93.84±8.17b 96.02±9.49 14.998 < 0.001 6 83.37±9.58b 90.41±9.18b 284.746 < 0.001 BMI(kg/m2) 0 24.96±5.74 25.06±4.28 0.001 0.802 0.019 0.976 0.450 0.981 3 24.71±5.04 24.87±4.74 0.025 0.875 6 24.43±4.40 24.39±4.45 0.018 0.895 FBG(mmol/L) 0 6.88±1.83 6.97±1.85 0.129 16.147 < 0.001 0.720 1.917 0.152 3 6.50±1.54 6.66±1.89 0.489 0.486 6 5.63±1.32b 6.35±1.76a 10.354 0.002 TC(mmol/L) 0 5.58±1.49 5.49±1.07 0.421 12.853 4.220 0.518 < 0.001 0.016 3 5.27±1.32 5.40±1.16 0.446 0.506 6 4.59±1.63b 5.18±1.33 8.863 0.004 TG(mmol/L) 0 1.76±0.48 1.77±0.65 < 0.001 5.767 1.107 0.994 0.004 0.330 3 1.63±0.53a 1.73±0.58 1.638 0.203 6 1.53±0.34b 1..69±0.64 6.134 0.015 遵医服药行为得分 0 15.38±6.05 16.60±4.10 2.678 48.128 6.793 0.105 < 0.001 0.001 3 18.16±3.77b 17.04±4.43 8.108 0.005 6 20.90±3.83b 19.57±4.52b 5.120 0.026 不良服药行为得分 0 26.12±6.67 25.09±6.20 1.073 58.387 5.775 0.303 < 0.001 0.004 3 31.64±5.57b 27.38±3.46b 45.267 < 0.001 6 32.09±5.34b 30.70±4.29b 4.369 0.039 日常生活管理行为得分 0 28.33±4.46 27.51±5.74 1.442 44.999 0.231 0.233 < 0.001 0.794 3 32.74±8.23b 31.54±8.85b 0.888 0.348 6 35.09±6.12b 33.22±8.31b 3.351 0.070 烟酒嗜好管理行为得分 0 6.39±2.56 6.83±1.92 1.817 8.854 2.877 0.181 < 0.001 0.059 3 7.50±1.68b 7.03±2.71 2.727 0.102 6 7.35±2.12b 7.63±1.71b 1.275 0.262 依从性总分 0 76.21±9.50 76.12±9.91 < 0.001 153.463 6.589 0.989 < 0.001 0.002 3 90.57±10.54b 82.99±10.48b 110.635 < 0.001 6 95.43±8.96b 91.12±10.46b 76.668 < 0.001 注:与0个月时的值比较,aP < 0.05, bP < 0.01。 表 5 两组患者的不良反应率[n(%)]
Table 5. Proportion of adverse reactions in the two groups[n(%)]
干预时间
(d)试验组
(n=105)对照组
(n=104)χ2值 P值 0 25(23.8) 23(25.5) 0.085 0.870 15 10(9.5) 21(20.6) 4.708 0.033 30 4(3.8) 18(17.6) 10.108 0.001 60 4(3.8) 19(15.7) 11.154 0.001 -
[1] Dosh SA. The treatment of adults with essential hypertension(Applied Evidence)[J]. J Fam Pract, 2002, 51(1): 74-81. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11927069 [2] 乔崇. 南阳地区高血压人群药物基因组学与抗高血压基因导向个体化用药临床研究[D]. 新乡: 新乡医学院, 2014.Qiao C. Clinical study on pharmacogenomics and antihypertensive gene-directed individualized drugs in hypertensive patients in Nanyang area[D]. Xinxiang: Xinxiang Medical College, 2014. [3] 何梅. 影响高血压患者服药依从性的因素及护理进展[J]. 中外医学研究, 2016, 14(3): 163-164. DOI: 10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2016.3.090.He M. Factors affecting drug compliance in hypertensive patients and advances in nursing[J]. Chinese and Foreign Medical Research, 2016, 14(3): 163-164. DOI: 10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2016.3.090. [4] 中国高血压防治指南修订委员会, 高血压联盟(中国), 中华医学会心血管病分会, 等. 中国高血压防治指南(2018年修订版)[J]. 中国心血管杂志, 2019, 24(1): 24-56.Writing Group of 2018 Chinese Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension, Chinese Hypertension League, Chinese Society of Cardiology, et al. Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of hypertension in China (Revised Edition, 2018)[J]. Chin Journal Cardiovasc, 2019, 24(1): 24-56. [5] Li J, Hu J, Sun R, et al. Association between cullin-3 single-nucleotide polymorphism rs17479770 and essential hypertension in the male chinese han population[J]. Dis Markers, 2017: 3062759. DOI: 10.1155/2017/3062759. [6] 张丽红. 家庭医生式服务对社区原发性高血压患者治疗依从性及控制率的影响[J]. 中国医药科学, 2017, 7(14): 248-250. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0616.2017.14.076Zhang LH. Effect of family doctor service on treatment compliance and control rate in community patients with essential hypertension[J]. Chinese Medical and Pharmacy, 2017, 2017, 7(14): 248-250. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0616.2017.14.076 [7] Cunningham PN, Chapman AB. Chapman. The future of pharmacogenetics in the treatment of hypertension[J]. Pharmacogenomics, 2019, 20(3): 129-132. DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2018-0191. [8] 唐红英. 高血压治疗依从性量表和态度与信念量表的编制及重庆市常模的建立[D]. 重庆: 第三军医大学, 2011.Tang HY. Compilation of hypertension treatment compliance scale and attitude and belief scale and establishment of Chongqing normal model[D]. Chongqing: Medical and Health Technology, 2011. [9] Byrd JB. Personalized medicine and treatment approaches in hypertension: current perspectives[J]. Integr Blood Press Control, 2016, 9: 59-67. DOI: 10.2147/IBPC.S74320. [10] Park YH, Kim H, Jang SN, et al. Predictors of adherence to medication in older Korean patients with hypertension[J]. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs, 2013, 12(1): 17-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2011.05.006. [11] Hiltunen TP, Donner KM, Sarin AP, et al. Pharmacogenomics of hypertension: a genome-wide, placebo-controlled cross-over study, using four classes of antihypertensive drugs[J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2015, 4(1): e001521. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.115.001778. [12] 何艳, 余报, 黄家贵, 等. 高血压基因导向个体化用药的临床研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(12): 679-683. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2018.12.006.He Y, Yu B, Huang JG, et al. Gene-oriented individualized medication in hypertension patients[J]. Chin J Clinicians (Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(12): 679-683. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2018.12.006.