High-risk behavior survey of 2017-2018 Dehong Dai Jingpo autonomous prefecture newly reported Burmese HIV infected people
-
摘要:
目的 了解2017年1月-2018年12月云南省德宏傣族景颇族自治州(德宏州)新报告缅甸籍人类免疫缺陷病毒(human immunodeficiency virus, HIV)感染者的一般人口学特征和高危行为的特征。 方法 对2017-2018年新报告的缅甸籍感染者进行横断面调查,收集其一般人口学信息、入境相关信息和高危行为发生情况等信息。 结果 本次共调查1 208例缅甸籍HIV感染者,其中男性820例(67.88%),女性388例(32.12%);年龄≥30岁占58.1%(702例),小学及以下文化程度占70.1%(847例),持证边民证/护照入境占73.5%(888例),来自克钦邦、掸邦和曼德勒省占79.06%(955例)。15.89%(192/1 208)的男性和0.58%(7/1 208)的女性在德宏境内有过吸毒行为;16.22%(133/820)男性和36.1%(140/388)的女性在德宏境内发生过无保护性行为。多因素Logistic回归分析模型结果显示:小学及以下学历、通过便道/其它方式入境、来自克钦邦和掸邦是男性发生吸毒行为的危险因素;女性、≥30岁、持证边民证/护照入境和1年内往返次数≥6次是在德宏境内发生无保护性行为危险因素。 结论 缅甸籍HIV感染者多为青壮年,文化程度较低,德宏境内发生高危行为的比例高,德宏州要巩固现有的艾滋病防治工作成效,管理好境内缅甸籍HIV感染者。 -
关键词:
- 人类免疫缺陷病毒 /
- 获得性免疫缺陷综合征 /
- 艾滋病病毒感染者 /
- 缅甸籍 /
- 高危行为
Abstract:Objective To study the general demographic characteristics and high-risk behaviors of HIV infected Burmese newly reported from 2017 to 2018 in Dehong Dai Jingpo autonomous prefecture (Dehong Prefecture) of Yunnan Province. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted among the newly reported Burmese infected persons from 2017 to 2018 to collect general demographic information, entry related information and information on the occurrence of high-risk behaviors. Results A total of 1 208 HIV infected Burmese were investigated, including 820 males (67.88%)and 388 females (32.12%); 58.1% (702 cases) ≥30 years old, 70.1% (847 cases) with primary school and below, 73.5% (888 cases) with border card/passport, 79.06% (955 cases) from Kachin, Shan and Mandalay provinces; 15.89% (192/1 208) of men and 0.58% (7/1 208) of women had drug abuse behavior in Dehong.16.22% (133/820) men and 36.1% (140/388) women had unprotected sexual behavior in Dehong. The results of multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that primary school and below, entry by road/ other means, coming from Kachin state and Shan state were risk factors for male drug abuse behavior. Female, ≥30 years old, entry with certificate/ passport, and the number of round trips ≥6 times in a year were risk factors for unprotected sex in Dehong. Conclusions Burmese HIV-infected people are mostly young and middle-aged, with a low education level, and a high proportion of high-risk behaviors in Dehong. Prefecture should consolidate the effectiveness of the existing AIDS prevention work and manage well the Burmese HIV-infected people. -
表 1 缅甸籍感染者基本情况及在德宏危险行为发生情况[n (%)]
Table 1. General characteristics and dangerous behaviors in Dehong of HIV infected Burmese [n (%)]
特征 仅发生吸毒行为
(n =172)仅发生无保护性行为
(n =246)吸毒+无保护性行为
(n =27)无高危行为
(n =763)合计
(n =1 208)性别 男 168(20.5) 109(13.3) 24(2.9) 519(63.3) 820(67.9) 女 4(1.0) 137(35.3) 3(0.8) 244(62.9) 388(32.1) 年龄(岁) < 30 84(16.6) 81(16.0) 8(1.6) 333(65.8) 506(41.9) ≥30 88(12.5) 165(23.5) 19(2.7) 430(61.3) 702(58.1) 教育程度 小学及以下 156(18.4) 157(18.5) 24(2.8) 510(60.2) 847(70.1) 初中及以上 16(4.4) 89(24.7) 3(0.8) 253(70.1) 361(29.9) 婚姻状态 未婚 89(19.4) 71(15.5) 12(2.6) 286(62.5) 458(37.9) 已婚有配偶 69(10.9) 148(23.3) 13(2.1) 404(63.7) 634(52.5) 离异或丧偶 14(12.1) 27(23.3) 2(1.7) 73(62.9) 116(9.6) 入境方式 边民证/护照 58(6.5) 214(24.1) 17(1.9) 599(67.5) 888(73.5) 便道/其他 114(35.6) 32(10.0) 10(3.1) 164(51.3) 320(26.5) 地区来源 克钦邦 82(17.1) 85(17.7) 12(2.5) 301(62.7) 480(39.7) 掸邦 58(16.6) 73(21.0) 10(2.9) 208(59.6) 349(28.9) 曼德勒省 14(11.1) 36(28.6) 1(0.8) 75(59.5) 126(10.4) 其他 18(7.1) 52(20.6) 4(1.6) 179(70.8) 253(21.0) 往返次数(次) 1 101(17.2) 72(12.2) 14(2.4) 402(68.3) 589(48.8) 2~ 45(13.4) 66(19.6) 7(2.1) 219(64.5) 337(27.9) ≥6 26(9.3) 107(38.2) 6(2.1) 141(50.4) 280(23.2) 计划停留时间 没有计划 47(17.3) 77(28.4) 10(3.7) 137(50.6) 271(22.4) 一周内 32(9.5) 77(22.8) 3(0.9) 226(66.9) 338(28.0) 半年以内 45(13.6) 36(10.9) 4(1.2) 245(74.2) 330(27.3) 半年以上 48(17.8) 56(20.8) 10(3.7) 155(57.6) 269(22.3) 注:有3名感染者未填无保护性行为发生情况 表 2 缅甸籍HIV感染者德宏境内吸毒行为影响因素Logistic回归分析模型分析
Table 2. Logistic regression analysis on the influencing factors of drug use behavior of HIV infected Burmese in Dehong
因素 吸毒行为发生率(%) 单因素 多因素 OR (95% CI)值 P值 OR (95% CI)值 P值 年龄(岁) < 30 24.1(89/370) 1.07(0.77~1.48) 0.695 1.04(0.69~1.57) 0.841 ≥30 22.9(103/450) 1.00 1.00 教育程度 小学及以下 29.6(173/584) 4.81(2.91~7.94) < 0.001 3.04(1.74~5.29) < 0.001 初中及以上 8.1(19/236) 1.00 1.00 婚姻状态 未婚 25.9(99/382) 0.58(0.30~1.15) 0.120 0.91(0.41~2.00) 0.813 已婚有配偶 19.6(78/398) 0.41(0.21~0.81) 0.010 0.73(0.34~1.57) 0.422 离异或丧偶 37.5(15/40) 1.00 1.00 入境方式 便道/其他 50.0(120/241) 6.98(4.91~9.94) < 0.001 5.42(3.68~8.01) < 0.001 边民证/护照 12.4(72/579) 1.00 1.00 地区来源 克钦邦 27.6(91/330) 2.59(1.55~4.35) < 0.001 2.99(1.64~5.44) < 0.001 掸邦 28.1(66/235) 2.66(1.55~4.56) < 0.001 2.61(1.42~4.83) 0.002 曼德勒省 15.4(14/91) 1.24(0.60~2.57) 0.567 1.52(0.67~3.46) 0.322 其他 12.8(21/164) 1.00 1.00 往返次数(次) 1 25.9(110/425) 1.62(1.04~2.53) 0.033 0.87(0.50~1.50) 0.614 2~ 23.2(51/220) 1.40(0.85~2.31) 0.185 0.71(0.39~1.30) 0.269 ≥6 17.7(31/175) 1.00 1.00 计划停留时间 没有计划 32.7(53/162) 0.73(0.44~1.22) 0.601 1.18(0.69~2.02) 0.550 1周内 15.2(34/224) 0.42(0.26~0.67) < 0.001 0.34(0.19~0.60) < 0.001 半年以内 19.8(49/248) 0.57(0.37~0.89) 0.013 0.47(0.28~0.78) 0.003 半年以上 30.1(56/186) 1.00 1.00 表 3 缅甸籍HIV感染者德宏境内无保护性行为影响因素Logistic回归分析模型分析
Table 3. Logistic regression analysis on the influencing factors of unprotected sex behavior of HIV infected Burmese in Dehong
因素 无保护性行为发生率(%) 单因素 多因素 OR (95% CI)值 P值 OR (95% CI)值 P值 性别 男 16.2(133/820) 1.00 1.00 女 36.1(140/388) 2.92(2.21~3.85) < 0.001 2.56(1.91~3.43) < 0.001 年龄(岁) < 30 17.6(89/506) 1.00 1.00 ≥30 26.2(184/702) 1.66(1.25~2.21) < 0.001 1.37(1.01~1.86) 0.044 教育程度 小学及以下 21.4(181/847) 0.80(0.60~1.06) 0.118 初中及以上 25.5(92/361) 1.00 婚姻状态 未婚 18.1(83/458) 0.66(0.41~1.08) 0.097 已婚有配偶 25.4(161/634) 1.02(0.65~1.61) 0.928 离异或丧偶 25.0(29/116) 1.00 入境方式 边民证/护照 26.0(231/888) 2.33(1.63~3.33) < 0.001 2.05(1.39~3.01) < 0.001 便道/其他 13.1(42/320) 1.00 1.00 地区来源 克钦邦 20.2(97/480) 0.89(0.62~1.29) 0.542 掸邦 23.8(83/349) 1.10(0.75~1.61) 0.636 曼德勒省 29.4(37/126) 1.46(0.90~2.38) 0.124 其他 22.1(56/253) 1.00 往返次数(次) 1 14.6(86/589) 1.00 1.00 2~ 21.7(73/337) 1.62(1.45~2.29) 0.006 1.39(0.97~2.00) 0.074 ≥6 40.4(113/280) 3.96(2.84~5.51) < 0.001 3.24(2.24~4.67) < 0.001 计划停留时间 没有计划 32.1(87/271) 1.45(1.00~2.12) 0.052 1.27(0.86~1.98) 0.255 1周内 23.7(80/338) 0.95(0.66~1.34) 0.804 0.64(0.42~0.97) 0.036 半年以内 12.1(40/330) 0.42(0.28~0.65) < 0.001 0.49(0.31~0.76) 0.002 半年以上 24.5(66/269) 1.00 1.00 -
[1] 陆林, 贾曼红, 张小波, 等. 1989-2003年云南省艾滋病流行态势分析[J].中华预防医学杂志, 2004, 38(5):309-312. DOI: 10.3760/j:issn:0253-9624.2004.05.006.Lu L, Jia MH, Zhang XB, et al. Analysis of the epidemic situation of AIDS in Yunnan Province from 1989 to 2003[J]. Chin J Prev Med, 2004, 38(5):309-312. DOI: 10.3760/j:issn:0253-9624.2004.05.006. [2] 王继宝, 陈晓晨, 段星, 等.云南省德宏傣族景颇族自治州2012-2016年新报告HIV感染者流行病学特征分析[J].中华流行病学杂志, 2017, 38(10):1372-1375. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zhlxbx201710015Wang JB, Chen XC, Duan X, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of newly reported HIV infections in Chinese and Burmese residents, during 2012-2016 in Dehong Dai and Jingpo Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan province[J]. Chin J Epidemiol, 2017, 38(10):1372-1375. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zhlxbx201710015 [3] 卓龙冉.云南省德宏州艾滋病流行特征与Spectruin/EPP模型应用研究[D].上海: 复旦大学, 2013.Zhuo LR. Study on the epidemic characteristics of AIDS and the application of spectrum / EPP model in Dehong Prefecture, Yunnan Province[D]. Shanghai: Fudan University, 2013. [4] 汤后林, 吕繁.桥梁人群在艾滋病病毒传播中的作用[J].中华流行病学杂志, 2007, 28(2):192-194. DOI: 10.3760/j.issn:0254-6450.2007.02.022.Tang HL, Lyu F. Role of bridge population in the transmission of human immunodeficiency virus[J]. Chin J Epidemiol, 2007, 28(2):192-194. DOI: 10.3760/j.issn:0254-6450.2007.02.022. [5] 王璐, 孟晓军, 丁国伟, 等.云南省跨境人口艾滋病病毒感染状况及影响因素调查[J].中华疾病控制杂志, 2010, 10:1040-1042 http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jbkzzz201010032Wang L, Meng XJ, Ding GW, et al. Investigation on HIV infection status and influencing factors among cross border population in Yunnan Province[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2010, 10:1040-1042. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jbkzzz201010032 [6] Ndugwa KS, Berg-Beckhoff G. The association between HIV/AIDS-related knowledge and perception of risk for infection: a systematic review[J]. Perspectives in Public Health, 2015, 135(6):1757913915595831. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26253643/ [7] Department of Population (Republic of the Union of Myanmar). Population and Housing Census of Myanmar, 2014: summary of provisional results[EB/OL]. (2014)[2020-12-07], https://myanmar.unfpa.org/en/publications/provisional-results-census-report-volume-1-1. [8] 李林, 张玉成, 杨跃诚, 等.云南省德宏傣族景颇族自治州2015年新报告缅甸籍HIV感染者高危行为调查[J].中华流行病学杂志, 2016, 37(12):1596-1601. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zhlxbx201612009Li L, Zhang YC, Yang YC, et al. Risk behaviors among newly reported Burmese HIV infected in Dehong. Dai and Jingpo autonomous prefectures of Yunnan province in 2015[J]. Chin J Epidemiol, 2016, 37(12):1596-1601. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zhlxbx201612009 [9] 黄津.云南省瑞丽市1989-2016年HIV/AIDS病例空间聚集性研究[D].昆明: 昆明医科大学, 2018.Huang J. Spatial clustering of HIV / AIDS cases in Ruili City, Yunnan Province, 1989-2016[D]. Kunming: Kunming Medical University, 2018. [10] 董莉娟, 肖民扬, 马艳玲, 等. 2013-2015年云南省吸毒人群艾滋病新发感染危险因素分析[J].中华疾病控制杂志, 2017, 21(12):1267-1270. DOI: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2017.12.019.Dong LJ, Xiao MY, Ma YL, et al. Risk factors of new HIV infection among drug users in Yunnan Province, 2013-2015[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2017, 21(12):1267-1270. DOI: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2017.12.019. [11] 唐仁海, 张志敏, 杨跃诚, 等.云南省德宏傣族景颇族自治州中国和缅甸籍吸毒人员HIV感染现状及其影响因素[J].中华预防医学杂志, 2016, 50(11):954-958. http://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=670567662Tang RH, Zhang ZM, Yang YC, et al. HIV infection and its influencing factors among Chinese and Burmese drug users in Dehong Dai Jingpo Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan Province[J]. Chin J Prev Med, 2016, 50(11):954-958. http://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=670567662 [12] 李晓静, 王海, 朱义彬.吸毒者中桥梁人群和非桥梁人群传播HIV危险性研究[J].安徽预防医学杂志, 2007, 06:411-413. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/71135X/201107/25880240.htmlLi XJ, Wang H, Zhu YB. Study on the risk of HIV transmission among bridge and non bridge population in drug users[J]. Anhui J Prev Med, 2007, 6:411-413. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/71135X/201107/25880240.html [13] 段松, 杨跃诚, 项丽芬, 等.云南省德宏州HIV感染者的阴性配偶中新发感染率研究[J].中华流行病学杂志, 2010, 31(9):997-1000.Duan S, Yang YC, Xiang LF, et al. A study on the new infection rate in the negative spouses of HIV infected people in Dehong Prefecture, Yunnan Province[J]. Chin J Epidemiol, 2010, 31(9):997-1000. [14] Yin X, Ru FL, Manhong J, et al. HIV prevalence and associated factors among foreign brides from Burma in Yunnan Province, China[J]. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(12):e115599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115599 [15] 徐洪吕, 陆林, 郑维斌, 等.云南省保山市跨境婚姻人群艾滋病流行现状[J].国际流行病学传染病学杂志, 2018, 45(4):250-253. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4149.2018.04.008.Xu HL, Lu L, Zheng WB, et al. HIV prevalence among cross-border marriage population in Baoshan City, Yunnan Province[J]. Inter J Epidemiol Infect Dis, 2018, 45(4):250-253. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4149.2018.04.008.