A study of the polymorphisms of XPC rs2279017 and susceptibility of esophageal cancer
-
摘要:
目的 探讨着色性干皮病基因组C(xeroderma pigmentosum group C, XPC)位点多态与长治市食管癌的关系以及主要危险因素的交互作用。 方法 采用成组匹配病例对照研究的方法，对150例食管癌患者和176例对照者进行问卷调查，应用实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应方法(real-time polymerase chain reaction, RT-PCR)对XPC rs2279017进行多态性检测，采用SPSS 20.0软件对研究结果进行统计分析。 结果 正常人群中，XPC基因型频率(GG、GT、TT)分别为48.86%、42.05%、9.09%，食管癌患者中分别为29.33%、46.00%、24.67%，差异有统计学意义(χ2 =20.12, P＜0.001)；携带等位基因T发生食管癌的风险是携带等位基因G的2.11倍(OR=2.11, 95% CI: 1.53~2.92, P < 0.001)；交互作用分析显示XPC突变基因T与饮酒具有协同作用(RERI=1.26, S=1.91, API=0.35)。 结论 XPC rs2279017位点多态性可能与长治市食管癌的发生有关。 -
关键词:
- 食管癌 /
- 着色性干皮病基因组C /
- 基因多态性 /
- 交互作用
Abstract:Objective To investigate the relationship between the polymorphisms of xeroderma pigmentosum group C (XPC) rs2279017 and the susceptibility of esophageal cancer in Changzhi area and its interaction with major risk factors. Methods In this study, 150 cases of esophageal cancer and 176 cases of control were selected to participate in the questionnaire survey, and the group case-control study was conducted. Then, the genotype of XPC rs2279017 was detected by quantitatire real-time PCR. The results were analyzed by SPSS 20.0. Results In the control group, the frequencies of XPC genotype (GG, GT, TT) were 48.86%, 42.05%, 9.09%, respectively. Among the esophageal cancer group, the rates were 29.33%, 46.00% and 24.67%, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2 =20.12, P < 0.001). The risk of esophageal cancer with allele T was 2.11 times that with allele G (OR=2.11, 95% CI: 1.53-2.92, P < 0.001). In addition, interaction analysis showed that XPC mutant T had a synergistic effect on alcohol consumption (RERI=1.26, S=1.91, API=0.35). Conclusions Polymorphism of XPC rs2279017 may be related to the occurrence of esophageal cancer in Changzhi City. -
Key words:
- Esophageal cancer /
- Xeroderma pigmentosum group C /
- Genetic polymorphisms /
- Interaction
-
图 1 XPC基因实时荧光定量PCR分型结果
Figure 1. Real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR results of XPC genotyping
表 1 XPC分布的Hardy-Weinberg平衡检验[n(%)]
Table 1. Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium Test for the distribution of XPC [n(%)]
XPC基因型 实际频数 理论频数 χ2值 P值 GG 86 70.21 5.46 0.065 GT 74 77.23 TT 16 28.60 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 XPC等位基因频率分布[n(%)]
Table 2. Frequency distributions of XPC allele gene [n(%)]
等位基因 病例组 对照组 OR(95% CI)值 χ2值 P值 G 157(52.33) 246(69.89) 1.00 21.14 ＜0.001 T 143(47.67) 106(30.11) 2.11(1.53~2.92)
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 XPC基因型频率分布及与食管癌危险性的关系[n(%)]
Table 3. Relationship between the distribution of XPC genotype and esophageal cancer [n(%)]
XPC基因型 病例组 对照组 OR(95% CI)值 χ2值 P值 GG 44(29.33) 86(48.86) 1.00 20.12 ＜0.001 GT 69(46.00) 74(42.05) 1.82(1.12~2.97) TT 37(24.67) 16(9.09) 4.52(2.27~9.01)
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 XPC与饮酒的交互作用分析
Table 4. Interaction between XPC genotype and drinking
XPC 饮酒 病例组 对照组 OR(95% CI)值 χ2值 P值 1 1 40 23 3.64(1.88~7.07) 15.15 ＜0.001 1 0 66 67 2.06(1.20~3.54) 6.96 0.008 0 1 12 19 1.32(0.57~3.05) 0.43 0.512 0 0 32 67 1.00
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods [J]. Int J Cancer, 2019, 144(8): 1941-1953. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31937. [2] 单晓丽, 杨丽秋, 何慧, 等. 哈尔滨市南岗区2006—2015年消化系统恶性肿瘤发病、死亡趋势分析及预测[J]. 肿瘤预防与治疗, 2018, 31(2): 127-136. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0904.2018.02.010.Shan XL, Yang LQ, He H, et al. Trend in incidence and mortality of gastrointestinal cancer in Nangang from 2006 to 2015 [J]. J Cancer Control Treat, 2018, 31(2): 127-136. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0904.2018.02.010. [3] Peng Q, Lao X, Tang W, et al. XPC Lys939Gln polymorphism contributes to colorectal cancer susceptibility: evidence from a meta-analysis [J]. Diagn Pathol, 2014, 9: 120. DOI: 10.1186/1746-1596-9-120. [4] Xiao M, Xiao S, Straaten TV, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in 19q13.3 genes associated with alteration of repair capacity to BPDE-DNA adducts in primary cultured lymphocytes [J]. Mutat Res, 2016, 812: 39-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2016.10.004. [5] 张莎. DNA修复基因XPD、XPC、XRCC4基因多态性与结直肠癌易感性的相关性研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2017. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10422-1017070391.htmZhang S. Genetic polymorphisms of DNA repair genes XPD, XPC and XRCC4 in relation to colorectal cancer susceptibility [D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2017. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10422-1017070391.htm [6] 高冬青, 史思达, 杨佳, 等. 食管癌高发区山东省肥城市2006年至2016年食管癌前病变转归情况分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2020, 47(22): 1159-1163. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2020.22.015.Gao DQ, Shi SD, Yang J, et al. Analysis of the outcomes of esophageal precancerous lesions between 2006 and 2016 in Feicheng City, a high-incidence area of esophageal cancer [J]. Chin J Clin Oncol, 2020, 47(22): 1159-1163. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2020.22.015. [7] Kaz AM, Grady WM. Epigenetic biomarkers in esophageal cancer [J]. Cancer Lett, 2014, 342(2): 193-199. DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.02.036. [8] Zhang Y, Li Z, Zhong Q, et al. Polymorphisms of the XPC gene may contribute to the risk of head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis [J]. Tumour Biol, 2014, 35(4): 3917-3931. DOI: 10.1007/s13277-013-1520-6. [9] Yoshihiro Y, Takeuchi S, Katoh T, et al. XPC intronll C/A polymorphism as a risk factor for prostate cancer [J]. Environ Health Prev Med, 2016, 21(2): 100-104. DOI: 10.1007/s12199-015-0505-z. [10] Corral R, Lewinger JP, Van Den Berg D, et al. Comprehensive analyses of DNA repair pathways, smoking and bladder cancer risk in Los Angeles and Shanghai [J]. Int J Cancer, 2014, 135(2): 335-347. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.28693. [11] 肖明扬, 高琳, 陈超, 等. 核苷酸切除修复通路基因多态与慢性苯中毒关联性[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2016, 32(8): 1108-1112. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2016-32-08-26.Xiao MY, Gao L, Chen C, et al. Risk of chronic benzene poisoning and single nucleotide polymorphisms in nucleotide excision repair pathway [J]. Chin J Public Heal, 2016, 32(8): 1108-1112. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2016-32-08-26. [12] Gil J, Gaj P, Misiak B, et al. CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk in Polish patients [J]. Med Oncol, 2014, 31(7): 72. DOI: 10.1007/s12032-014-0072-y. -
点击查看大图
图(1) / 表(4)
计量
- 文章访问数: 329
- HTML全文浏览量: 162
- PDF下载量: 35
- 被引次数: 0