HPLP-Ⅱ健康促进生活方式量表中文版的研制及其性能测试

曹文君; 郭颖; 平卫伟; 郑建中

doi:10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2016.03.018

HPLP-Ⅱ健康促进生活方式量表中文版的研制及其性能测试

doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2016.03.018

曹文君^1,2,
郭颖²,
平卫伟¹,
郑建中^1, ,

1. 长治医学院流行病与卫生统计学教研室, 山西长治 046000;
2. 长治医学院心血管病研究所, 山西长治 046000

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金（81302518）；山西省长治医学院创新团队（CX201403）；山西省基础研究计划（2015021185）

详细信息

作者简介:
曹文君(1980-),女,山西长治人,副教授,博士。主要研究方向:健康促进的测量与评价。

中图分类号: R395.1;R181
计量
- 文章访问数: 3379
- HTML全文浏览量: 431
- PDF下载量: 749
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-12-07
- 修回日期: 2016-01-12

Development and psychometric tests of a Chinese version of the HPLP-Ⅱ Scales

1. Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi 046000;
2. The Institute for Cardiovascular Disease, Chang Zhi Medical College, Changzhi 046000, China

摘要

摘要: 目的研制健康促进生活方式量表-Ⅱ（health promoting lifestyle profile-Ⅱ, HPLP-Ⅱ）中文版并验证量表维度及信度和效度。方法采用随机整群抽样方法，于2014年5月～10月对抽取到的社区居民进行入户面对面调查。测定该量表的心理学特征，包括内部一致性、分半信度、重测信度、条目分析和因子分析。结果在收回的950份问卷中，18岁以上的有效问卷862份，研究对象年龄在18～84岁，平均年龄（41.02±12.60）岁。探索性因子分析结果显示因子载荷<0.4、在两个及以上因子上有载荷及条目含义与其所在因子概念不符的共计12条目，删除后得到HPLP-Ⅱ的修订版本（health promoting lifestyle profile-Ⅱ, revise, HPLP-ⅡR）。HPLP-ⅡR结果支持6因子结构，共解释总体方差48.95%的变异。HPLP-ⅡR健康促进生活方式量表中文修订版各条目与其所在维度相关性（集合效度）均高于该条目与其他维度间相关性（区分效度）。各维度分半信度为0.64～0.78，Cronbach's α系数为0.63~0.81，量表重测信度为0.69。营养因子平均得分最高（63.63±15.01）分，健康责任因子得分最低（43.11±14.70）分，6个因子间的相关性范围为0.21～0.51。结论 HPLP-ⅡR健康促进生活方式修订量表适用于中国人群测定。
- 健康促进 /
- 心理学试验 /
- 流行病学方法
Abstract: Objective To develop a Chinese version of the Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile-Ⅱ(HPLP-Ⅱ)and to evaluate the factor structure as well as the reliability and validity of the Chinese version. Methods From May to October 2014, we used a multi-stage stratified random cluster method and a face to face survey of selected community residents for data collection. We measured the psychological characteristics, including internal consistency, split-half reliability, test-retest reliability, item analysis and factor analysis. Results Of the 950 collected questionnaires, 862 were qualified. Ages of respondents ranged from 18 to 84 years, with a mean age of 41.02 years. Twelve items were eliminated after examination of those that factor loadings less than 0.4, those cross-loading on two or more factors and those not conceptually coherent with the factor, and thus got the revised version of HPLP-Ⅱ (HPLP-ⅡR); 40 of the original 52 items of the HPLP-ⅡR remained. HPLP-ⅡR supported a six-factor structure, explaining 48.95% of the total variance. The item-to-own subscale correlation (convergent validity) was greater than item-to-other subscale correlations (discriminant validity). The split-half (odd-even) reliability was 0.64 to 0.78, the Cronbach's α coefficient's level ranged from 0.63 to 0.81, and the test-retest reliability was 0.69. The mean scores of each HPLP-ⅡR dimension ranged from 43.11(Health Responsibility, HR) to 63.63 (Nutrition, N), and the correlations between factors ranged from 0.21 to 0.51. Conclusions HPLP-ⅡR is suitable for measuring health-promoting lifestyles of population in China.
- Health promotion /
- Psychological tests /
- Epidemiologic methods

HTML全文

参考文献(17)

祖洁琛. 全国亿万农民健康促进行动策略分析 [J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2010,14 (8): 745-747.

Chen MY. The effectiveness of health promotion counseling to family caregivers [J]. Public Health Nurs, 1999,16(2):125-132.

Recommendations for the framework and format of healthy people 2020. The secretary's advisory committee on national health promotion and disease prevention objectives for 2020 [K]. 2008

Hurlbut JM, Robbins LK, Hoke MM. Correlations between spirituality and health-promoting behaviors among sheltered homeless women [J]. J Community Health Nurs, 2011,28(2):81-91.

Mohamadian H, Eftekhar H, Rahimi A, et al. Predicting health-related quality of life by using a health promotion model among Iranian adolescent girls: a structural equation modeling approach [J]. Nurs Health, 2011,13(2):141-148.

Zhang SC, Wei CN, Fukumoto K, et al. A comparative study of health-promoting lifestyles in agricultural and non-agricultural workers in Japan [J]. Environ Health Prev Med, 2011,16(2):80-89.

Lee RL, Loke AJ. Health-promoting behaviors and psychosocial well-being of university students in Hong Kong [J]. Public Health Nurs, 2005,22(3):209-220.

Pinar R, Celik R, Bahcecik N. Reliability and construct validity of the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile Ⅱ in an adult Turkish population [J]. Nurs Res, 2009,58(3):184-193.

Hulme PA, Walker SN, Effle KJ, et al. Health-promoting lifestyle behaviors of Spanish-speaking Hispanic adults [J]. J Transcult Nurs, 2003,14(3):244-254.

张国强,刘博,敬文,等. 新疆生产建设兵团2008-2012年居民死因分析 [J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2014,18(6):522-525.

洪静芳,李峥. 临床实习护生健康促进生活方式及相关因素的研究 [J]. 中华护理杂志, 2008,43(2):103-107.

王冬, 陈美燕, 周创. 青少年健康促进量表在大陆某高校学生中的适用性研究 [J].中国卫生统计, 2009,26(1):80-82.

Cao WJ, Chen CS, Hua Y, et al. Factor analysis of a Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile: application to older adults in Mainland China [J]. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 2012,55(3):632-638.

Teng HL, Yen M, Fetzer S. Health promotion lifestyle profile-Ⅱ: Chinese version short form [J]. J Adv Nurs, 2010,66(8):1864-1873.

Meihan L, Chung-Ngok W. Validation of the psychometric properties of the health-promoting lifestyle profile in a sample of Taiwanese women [J]. Qual Life Res, 2011,20(4):523-528.

Cho SJ, Li F, Bandalos D. Accuracy of the Parallel Analysis Procedure With Polychoric Correlations [J]. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2009,69(5):748-759.

Pender NJ, Murdaugh CL, Parsons MA. Health promotion in nursing practice [M]. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2005.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计