护-护合作量表在我国护士中的普适性研究

石娟; 宋瑰琦; 宋永霞; 齐永扎; 王维利

doi:10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2016.05.019

护-护合作量表在我国护士中的普适性研究

doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2016.05.019

石娟^1,2,
宋瑰琦²,
宋永霞¹,
齐永扎²,
王维利^1,3, ,

1. 安徽医科大学护理学院, 安徽合肥 230601;
2. 安徽省立医院护理部, 安徽合肥 230001;
3. 安徽省护理学国际联合研究中心, 安徽合肥 230601

基金项目:

安徽省教育厅质量工程项目（2014msgzs137）；安徽省科技厅项目（1303063025）

详细信息

作者简介:
石娟(1986-),女,安徽安庆人,在读硕士研究生。主要研究方向:护理管理。

中图分类号: R181.2;R192.6
计量
- 文章访问数: 410
- HTML全文浏览量: 72
- PDF下载量: 38
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-11-19
- 修回日期: 2016-01-14

Universality of nurse-nurse collaboration scale in Chinese clinical nurses

1. Department of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230601, China;
2. Department of Nursing, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei 230001, China;
3. International Union Research Center of nursing science in Anhui Province, Hefei 230601, China

摘要

摘要: 目的评价中文版护-护合作量表（nurse-nurse collaboration scale，NNCS）在我国护士中的心理测量学属性。方法将NNCS进行翻译、回译和跨文化调适后形成中文版，对合肥三所医院的574名护士进行调查，利用SPSS 13.0和AMOS 17.0统计软件进行分析，形成最终量表。结果经分析删选后，中文版NNCS共25个条目，4个维度，总量表Cronbach's α系数为0.93，平均内容效度为0.98。提取的4个因子累积贡献率达57.97%；一阶和二阶验证性因子分析显示：χ²/df =2.33/2.55, GFI=0.92/0.92, AGFI=0.90/0.90, RMSEA=0.05/0.05, RMR=0.02/0.05, NFI=0.93/0.92, CFI=0.96/0.95, TLI=0.95/0.94。结论中文版NNCS可作为护-护合作水平的有效评估工具。
- 护士 /
- 问卷调查 /
- 评价研究,主题
Abstract: Objective To explore the universality of nurse-nurse collaboration scale in Chinese clinical nurses. Methods The NNCS was translated according to Brislin principle and adapted according to Chinese culture. The universality of Chinese version of NNCS was tested among 574 clinical nurses in Hefei city. SPSS 13.0 software and AMOS 17.0 software were used to analyze data and then final Chinese version of NNCS was formed. Results The Chinese version of NNCS was consisted of 25 items in 4 dimensions. The Cronbach's α for the over scale was 0.93 and the content validity index was 0.98. Four factors were extracted which contributed 57.97% of the total variance. First-confirmatory factor analysis and second-confirmatory factor analysis showed: χ²/df =2.33/2.55, GFI=0.92/0.92, AGFI=0.90/0.90, RMSEA=0.05/0.05, RMR=0.02/0.05, NFI=0.93/0.92, CFI=0.96/0.95, TLI=0.95/0.94. Conclusions The Chinese version of NNCS is reliable and valid, and can be used to assess the status of collaboration among clinical nurses in China.
- Nurses /
- Questionnaires /
- Evaluation studies as topic

HTML全文

参考文献(13)

Longo J, Hain D. Bullying: a hidden threat to patient safety [J]. Nephrol Nurs J, 2014,41(2):193-199.

Goffman D, Brodman M, Friedman AJ, et al. Improved obstetric safety through programmatic collaboration [J]. J Healthc Risk Manag, 2014,33(3):14-22.

Dougherty MB, Larson EL. The nurse-nurse collaboration scale [J]. J Nurs Adm, 2010,40(1):17-25.

贾晓彤,杨辉. 中文版护护合作量表信效度检验 [J]. 护理学杂志, 2014,29(10):58-61.

Jones PS, Lee JW, Phillips LR, et al. An adaptation of Brislin's translation model for cross-cultural research [J]. Nurs Res, 2001,50(5):300-304.

张宜民. 城市公立医疗机构医生工作满意度、职业倦怠与离职意向关系的模型研究 [D]. 上海:复旦大学, 2011.

Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER. Measurement in nursing and health research [M]. New York:springer Pub, 2010:50-62.

徒文静,徐桂华. 中文版炎性肠病自我效能量表的信效度研究 [J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2014,30(22):18-21.

吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务SPSS操作与应用 [M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2010:158-192,237-265

,217.

陈静,张贤,张振香,等. 医护合作量表的汉化及信效度检验 [J]. 中华护理杂志, 2014,49(2):236-240.

冼君定,谭健烽,万崇华,等. WHOQOL-BREF量表用于精神分裂症和抑郁症的信效度研究 [J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2015,19(5):500-503.

Msil CM, Jones SL, Warner CD. Structural equation modeling and its relationship to multiple regression and factor analysis [J]. Res Nurs Health, 1998,21(3):271-281.

吴明隆. 结构方程模型:AMOS的操作与应用 [M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2010:213-290.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计