农村儿童溺水危险水域评级指标体系研究

徐浩锋; 孟瑞琳; 朱旭豪; 周志珊; 许燕君; 朱永坚; 林立丰; 许晓君

doi:10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2017.10.012

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名

邮箱

手机号码

标题

留言内容

验证码

农村儿童溺水危险水域评级指标体系研究

doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2017.10.012

1. 广东省疾病预防控制中心慢性非传染性疾病预防控制所, 广东广州 511430;
2. 清远市疾病预防控制中心慢性非传染性疾病预防控制科, 广东清远 511515;
3. 清远市清新区疾病预防控制中心疾病预防控制科, 广东清远 511500

基金项目:

广东省医学科研基金资助（A2013073）

详细信息

作者简介:
徐浩锋(1962-),男,广东从化人,主任医师,学士。主要研究方向:伤害的预防控制。

中图分类号: R846.4
计量
- 文章访问数: 350
- HTML全文浏览量: 63
- PDF下载量: 48
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-05-07
- 修回日期: 2017-08-17

A study on the evaluation index system for water bodies for childhood drowning in rural area

1. Institute of Control and Prevention for Chronic Non-infective Disease, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 511430, China;
2. Department of Control and Prevention for Chronic Non-infective Disease, Qingyuan City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Qingyuan 511515, China;
3. Department of Control and Prevention for Chronic Non-infective Disease, Qingxin District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Qingyuan 511500, China

摘要

摘要: 目的建立农村儿童溺水危险水域的评级指标体系。方法通过对水域的实地勘查建立危险水域的初级指标，采用Delphi法，根据各指标重要性得分均值筛选指标，并确定权重。结果通过15个专家三轮的咨询，得到7个一级指标，25个二级指标。三轮问卷回收率分别为100%，93.3%，100%；专家权威系数为0.79；一级指标、二级指标重要性、必要性的协调系数均大于0.5，分别为0.862，0.705，0.823，0.696（均有P<0.01）；各指标变异系数的范围为0.00~0.20，小于0.25。结论本研究建立的农村儿童溺水危险水域评级指标体系结果稳定，具有可操作性。
- 儿童,溺水 /
- 危险 /
- 德尔菲技术
Abstract: Objective To construct a scientific and reasonable evaluation index system for water bodies for childhood drowning in rural area. Methods The dimensions of the indicator system was determined based on the survey of water bodies. A 3-round Delphi process was conducted. The weight of index was calculated by method of proportionate allocation. Results The index system including 7 first-class indicators and 25 second-class indicators was developed in according to three rounds of Delphi consultations by 15 specialists. The response rate of three rounds was 100%, 93.3% and 100%, respectively. The specialist authority coefficient was 0.79. The W for each class of indicator was 0.862, 0.705, 0.823 and 0.696, respectively(all P<0.01). The CV for each indicator ranged from 0.00 to 0.20. Conclusions The index system established in the study has good reliability and feasibility.
- Children, rowning /
- Risk /
- Delphi